Research Article

Color Stability and Surface Properties of PMMA/ZrO2 Nanocomposite Denture Base Material after Using Denture Cleanser

Table 4

Effect of variation in ZrO2 concentration on acrylic specimen color (ΔE), surface roughness (mμ), and hardness (VHN) after immersion in different cleansing solutions for the specific times.

TimeNano-ZrO2 (%)Water (W) mean (SE)Corega (C) mean (SE)NaOCl (S) mean (SE)Renew (R) mean (SE)

Color
T101.51 (0.02)0.0012.99 (0.03)a0.0013.01 (0.05)a0.2861.92 (0.04)0.009
2.51.69 (0.02)2.98 (0.04)a3.05 (0.07)a1.97 (0.02)a
51.45 (0.01)2.89 (0.08)3.01 (0.05)a1.96 (0.05)a
T201.99 (0.04)a0.0014.91 (0.06)a0.045.9 (0.09)0.0013.83 (0.12)0.001
2.52.04 (0.05)a4.96 (0.05)a,b6.85 (0.13)a2.99 (0.07)
52.20 (0.03)4.99 (0.08)b6.91 (0.09)a3.20 (0.06)

Roughness
T000.14 (0.02)0.001
2.50.19 (0.01)
50.26 (0.02)
T100.14 (0.01)0.0010.19 (0.02)0.0010.24 (0.02)0.0010.18 (0.02)0.001
2.50.17 (0.02)0.23 (0.02)0.33 (0.02)a0.21 (0.01)
50.24 (0.02)0.27 (0.0)0.34 (0.02)a0.26 (0.01)
T200.14 (0.01)0.0010.23 (0.01)0.0010.36 (0.01)0.0010.20 (0.02)0.001
2.50.19 (0.01)0.27 (0.02)0.39 (0.02)a0.26 (0.02)
50.25 (0.01)0.33 (0.02)0.39 (0.01)a0.29 (0.02)

Hardness
T0030.63 (1.68)0.001
2.538.77 (1.42)
541.62 (1.44)
T1031.05 (1.34)0.00127.79 (1.37)0.00125.17 (1.06)0.00128.84 (1.1)0.001
2.538.64 (1.76)34.85 (1.23)34.29 (1.26)a39.59 (1.07)a
541.46 (1.46)40.82 (1.4)35.22 (1.2)a38.8 (1.21)a
T2030.30 (1.27)0.00125.68 (1.3)0.00124.16 (1.36)0.00127.29 (1.43)0.001
2.539.07 (0.97)33.11 (0.84)31.54 (1.58)a36.76 (1.1)a
541.13 (1.27)37.45 (1.45)30.27 (1.32)a36.07 (1.2)a

Significant difference at α = 0.05. The same letter indicates nonsignificant vertically per concentration (). T0 = 2 days of immersion, T1 = 180 days of immersion, T2 = 365 days of immersion, 0% = pure acrylic resin, 2.5%, acrylic resin reinforced with 2.5% nano-ZrO2, 5% = acrylic resin reinforced with 5% nano-ZrO2. The same small letters indicated nonsignificant vertically per time.