Pt-Co and Pt-Ni Catalysts of Low Metal Content for H₂ Production by Reforming of Oxygenated Hydrocarbons and Comparison with Reported Pt-Based Catalysts

Table 4

Results of APR of ethylene glycol over different catalysts.

Catalyst	EG (% w)	T (K)	P (bar)	WHSV (h^−1)	LHSV (h^−1)	ConversionC to gas (%)	Selectivity (%)		H2 yield (%)	(min^−1)	Reference
							C5^−	H2
Pt(3)/Al2O3	1	498	29.3		0.6	90.0	4.0	96.0	86.4	5.3	Shabaker et al. [11]
R-Ni(14)Sn	1	498	25.8		5.1	93.0	4.0	95.0	88.4	1.4	Shabaker et al. [11]
Pt(1)	10	498	29.3		72.0	5.4	1.2	87.1	4.7	1.9	Huber et al. [12]
Pt(1)Ni(1)	10	498	29.3		70.2	5.9	0.0	91.0	5.4	5.2	Huber et al. [12]
Pt(1)Ni(5)	10	498	29.3		138.5	3.6	0.9	89.5	3.2	3.0	Huber et al. [12]
Pt(1)Ni(8)	10	498	29.3		128.6	3.5	2.0	90.2	3.2	2.8	Huber et al. [12]
Pt(1)Co(5)	10	498	29.3		57.4	8.4	0.5	88.2	7.4	5.1	Huber et al. [12]
Pt(1.5)/Al2O3	1	548	200.0	1.2		78	0.3				De Vlieger et al. [33]
Pt(1.5)/Al2O3	20	723	250.0	12		74	16.9				De Vlieger et al. [33]
Ni(19)/SiO2	10	498	22.0		n/r	2.3	13.0	57.0	1.3	14.0	Davda et al. [19]
Pd(5)/SiO2	10	498	22.0		n/r	3.1	0.0	98.5	3.0	30.0	Davda et al. [19]
Pt(6)/SiO2	10	498	22.0		n/r	21.0	13.0	77.9	16.4	275.0	Davda et al. [19]
Ru(6)/SiO2	10	498	22.0		n/r	42.0	58.0	7.0	2.9	20.0	Davda et al. [19]
Pt(1)/CMK-3	10	523	45.6	2.0		25.4	4.5	n/r	26.6	103	Kim et al. [38]
Pt(3)/CMK-3	10	523	45.6	2.0		46.0	n/r	n/r	49.3	46.4	Kim et al. [36]
Pt(7)/CMK-3	10	523	45.6	2.0		69.8	7.1	n/r	72.1	31.2	Kim et al. [35]
Pt(3) CMK-9	10	523	45.6	2.0		44.9	4.2	n/r	49.3	n/r	Kim et al. [37]
Fe(3) CMK-9	10	523	45.6	2.0		12.1	8.9	n/r	27.1	n/r	Kim et al. [37]
Pt(3)Fe(3) (1 : 1)	10	523	45.6	2.0		60.8	3.3	n/r	64.9	n/r	Kim et al. [37]
Pt(3)Fe(6) (1 : 2)	10	523	45.6	2.0		63.2	3.1	n/r	66.7	n/r	Kim et al. [37]
Pt(3)Fe(9) (1 : 3)	10	523	45.6	2.0		68.4	2.8	n/r	71.1	∼70-80	Kim et al. [37]
Pt(3)Fe(12) (1 : 4)	10	523	45.6	2.0		60.1	2.6	n/r	70.7	n/r	Kim et al. [37]
Pt(3)Fe(15) (1 : 5)	10	523	45.6	2.0		58.9	2.7	n/r	68.8	n/r	Kim et al. [37]

Steady state conditions, fixed bed reactor.