Research Article
Management of Cattle Dung and Novel Bioelectricity Generation Using Microbial Fuel Cells: An Ingenious Experimental Approach
Table 5
Comparison analysis of various studies.
| Substrate | Anode | Cathode | Power density | References |
| Glucose with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria | Carbon/graphite | Carbon/graphite | 2096.5 ± 11.8 µW/m2 | [34] | Glucose with Escherichia coli | Carbon/graphite | Carbon/graphite | 1606 mW/m2 | [35] | Glucose with Escherichia coli | Carbon/graphite | Carbon/graphite | 2420 mW/m2 | [36] | Algae strain | Carbon | Copper sheet | 19151 mW/m2 | [37] | — | Alumina and nickel nanoparticles | Polymer alumina and nickel nanoparticles | 1270 + 30 mW/m2 | [38] | Biowaste from environment | Carbon/graphite | Carbon/graphite | 396.7 mW/m2 | [39] | Livestock waste | Carbon/graphite | Carbon/graphite | 122 mW/m2 | [40] | Mixed microalgae | Carbon | Carbon | 76 mW/m2 | [10] | Mixed microalgae | Gold | Graphite | 10 W/m2 | [10] | Cattle dung with B1–B9 bacteria | Zinc | Carbon | 1465 mW/m2 | Present study |
|
|