Research Article
Different Oral Antithrombotic Therapy for the Treatment of Ventricular Thrombus: An Observational Study from 2010 to 2019
Table 3
Main results of Cox proportional hazards regression analysis†.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
†In the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the end point was thrombus resolution in patients with VT within 12 months’ follow-up. ‡Adjusted for age, sex, presenting diagnosis, coronary artery disease, heart failure, LVEF, and D-Dimer. §Other diagnoses included peripartum cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, hypertensive heart disease, and noncompaction of ventricular myocardium. VT: ventricular thrombus; N: number of patients; NOACs: non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; VKAs: vitamin K antagonists; ICM: ischemic cardiomyopathy; DCM: dilated cardiomyopathy; HCM: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval. |