Research Article

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Quality of Endodontic Treatment and Prevalence of Procedural Errors in Mandibular Molars

Table 5

Comparison of the frequency of procedural errors in the right and left mandibular first and second molars.

Procedural errorsRight first molarsLeft first molarsRight second molarsLeft second molars values

Underfilling34 (37.8%)16 (20.0%)34 (47.2%)30 (34.9%)0.005
Overfilling15 (16.7%)11 (13.8%)13 (18.1%)16 (18.6%)0.846
Voids10 (11.1%)9 (11.3%)10 (13.9%)18 (20.9%)0.218
Missed canals12 (13.3%)10 (12.5%)22 (30.6%)13 (15.1%)0.010
Ledge formation6 (6.7%)2 (2.5%)06 (7.0%)0.085
Root fracture002 (2.8%)2 (2.3%)0.219
Apical perforation4 (4.4%)7 (8.8%)4 (5.6%)9 (10.5%)0.404
Strip perforation2 (2.2%)0000.150
Broken instrument04 (5.0%)4 (5.6%)2 (2.3%)0.136
Canal transportation9 (10.0%)3 (3.8%)7 (9.7%)1 (1.2%)0.037
Root resorption3 (3.3%)6 (7.5%)7 (9.7%)2 (2.3%)0.134
Apical lesions44 (48.9%)34 (42.5%)39 (54.2%)34 (39.5%)0.253