Research Article
Impact of Diabetic Ketoacidosis on Thyroid Function in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus
Table 3
Comparison of thyroid function between patients with diabetes with and without DKA.
| Author | Year | Country | DKA | Control | Mean | SD | n | Mean | SD | n |
| T4 | Alexander et al. [27] | 1983 | United States | 5.5 | 0.6 | 12 | 8.7 | 0.6 | 6 | Chiarelli et al.[28] | 1989 | Germany | 58.22 | 15.02 | 16 | 74.04 | 23.07 | 45 | Daoxiong et al. [10] | 1999 | China | 79.38 | 19.13 | 65 | 94.6 | 18.12 | 60 | Li et al. [29] | 2012 | China | 82.4289 | 22.6743 | 38 | 109.094 | 17.9297 | 36 | Lin et al. [14] | 2003 | China | 4.39 | 3.03 | 76 | 7.6 | 1.86 | 62 | Schienger et al. [30] | 1982 | Germany | 7.6 | 0.3 | 8 | 7.8 | 0.5 | 8 | Huang and Su [18] | 2016 | China | 96.41 | 5.12 | 63 | 107.52 | 8.12 | 62 | Fan [19] | 2014 | China | 95.83 | 7.54 | 81 | 106.45 | 9.09 | 94 | Zhao et al. [31] | 2012 | China | 5.65 | 2.8 | 91 | 9.28 | 2.85 | 110 | Wang and Du [20] | 2013 | China | 96.3 | 23.1 | 69 | 114.8 | 41.2 | 74 | Qiao [32] | 2012 | China | 5.95 | 1.57 | 40 | 7.8 | 1.67 | 40 | S. Liu [33] | 2016 | China | 92.9 | 18.78 | 23 | 114.09 | 18.83 | 31 | Chen et al. [34] | 2016 | China | 102.46 | 22.73 | 65 | 107.28 | 23.28 | 65 | Zhang [21] | 2014 | China | 95.8 | 23.2 | 74 | 165 | 42.3 | 84 | Ding and Ji [22] | 2011 | China | 96.29 | 20.1 | 30 | 100.3 | 20.33 | 30 |
| T3 | Alexander et al. [27] | 1983 | United States | 49.9 | 7.3 | 12 | 88 | 8 | 6 | Alexander et al. [6] | 1982 | United States | 49 | 9 | 4 | 103 | 7 | 11 | Chiarelli et al.[28] | 1989 | Germany | 1.04 | 0.36 | 16 | 1.39 | 0.42 | 45 | Daoxiong et al. [10] | 1999 | China | 1 | 0.24 | 65 | 1.25 | 0.36 | 60 | Li et al. [29] | 2012 | China | 1.5482 | 0.4371 | 38 | 1.9497 | 0.2762 | 36 | Lin et al. [14] | 2003 | | 59.36 | 36.11 | 76 | 91.4 | 31.85 | 62 | Schienger et al. [30] | 1982 | Germany | 124 | 14 | 8 | 115 | 6 | 8 | Huang and Su [18] | 2016 | China | 1.34 | 0.25 | 63 | 1.52 | 0.31 | 62 | Fan [19] | 2014 | China | 1.38 | 0.12 | 81 | 1.55 | 0.21 | 94 | Zhao et al. [31] | 2012 | China | 0.54 | 0.51 | 91 | 1.02 | 0.38 | 110 | Wang and Du [20] | 2013 | China | 1.38 | 0.23 | 69 | 1.59 | 0.47 | 74 | Qiao [32] | 2012 | China | 0.75 | 0.22 | 40 | 1.05 | 0.21 | 40 | S. Liu [33] | 2016 | China | 1.6 | 0.41 | 23 | 1.85 | 0.33 | 31 | Chen et al. [34] | 2016 | China | 1.53 | 0.24 | 65 | 1.72 | 0.27 | 65 | Zhang [21] | 2014 | China | 1.39 | 0.24 | 74 | 1.61 | 0.45 | 84 | Ding and Ji [22] | 2011 | | 0.75 | 0.2 | 30 | 1.72 | 0.31 | 30 |
| FT4 | Liu [35] | 2012 | China | 0.84 | 0.21 | 20 | 1.15 | 0.38 | 60 | Chiarelli et al.[28] | 1989 | Germany | 10.24 | 2.94 | 16 | 11.55 | 3.62 | 45 | Daoxiong et al. [10] | 1999 | China | 14.21 | 2.8 | 65 | 12.13 | 2.88 | 60 | Qiu et al. [36] | 2018 | China | 12.4 | 4.89 | 75 | 15.97 | 3.08 | 39 | Lin et al. [14] | 2003 | China | 0.59 | 0.36 | 76 | 1.18 | 0.4 | 62 | Huang and Su [18] | 2016 | China | 13.21 | 0.24 | 63 | 14.29 | 0.31 | 62 | Fan [19] | 2014 | China | 13.44 | 0.95 | 81 | 14.35 | 0.36 | 94 | Xin et al. [37] | 2010 | China | 12.99 | 7.3 | 85 | 15.34 | 3.97 | 118 | Wang and Du [20] | 2013 | China | 13 | 2.3 | 69 | 14 | 1.2 | 74 | Qiao [32] | 2012 | China | 1.13 | 0.26 | 40 | 1.21 | 0.17 | 40 | S. Liu [33] | 2016 | China | 10.76 | 2.1 | 23 | 12.12 | 1.46 | 31 | Chen et al. [34] | 2016 | China | 11.86 | 2.57 | 65 | 12.51 | 2.78 | 65 | Zhang [21] | 2014 | China | 13.2 | 2.4 | 74 | 14.9 | 1.3 | 84 | Ding and Ji [22] | 2011 | China | 13.32 | 2.52 | 30 | 14.31 | 4.01 | 30 | Schienger et al. [30] | 1982 | Germany | 2.3 | 0.29 | 8 | 2.2 | 0.29 | 8 |
| FT3 | Liu [35] | 2012 | China | 3.96 | 0.92 | 20 | 5.83 | 1.96 | 60 | Chiarelli et al.[28] | 1989 | Germany | 2.05 | 1.01 | 16 | 2.35 | 0.71 | 45 | Daoxiong et al. [10] | 1999 | China | 2.48 | 0.9 | 65 | 3.46 | 0.89 | 60 | Qiu et al. [36] | 2018 | China | 2.47 | 0.74 | 75 | 3.07 | 0.91 | 39 | Fan [19] | 2014 | China | 3.54 | 0.23 | 81 | 3.69 | 0.44 | 94 | Xin et al. [37] | 2010 | China | 2.61 | 1.93 | 85 | 3.31 | 1.27 | 118 | Wang and Du [20] | 2013 | China | 3.54 | 0.53 | 69 | 3.65 | 0.49 | 74 | Qiao [32] | 2012 | China | 2.21 | 0.61 | 40 | 2.85 | 0.3 | 40 | S. Liu [33] | 2016 | China | 4.32 | 0.66 | 23 | 4.95 | 0.63 | 31 | Chen et al. [34] | 2016 | China | 3.95 | 1.14 | 65 | 4.46 | 1.17 | 65 | Zhang [21] | 2014 | China | 3.55 | 0.54 | 74 | 3.64 | 0.51 | 84 | Ding and Ji [22] | 2011 | China | 2.21 | 0.41 | 30 | 4.25 | 0.41 | 30 |
| TSH | Alexander et al. [27] | 1983 | The United States | 3.4 | 0.9 | 12 | 4.4 | 0.7 | 6 | Liu [35] | 2012 | China | 0.83 | 0.73 | 20 | 1.25 | 1.19 | 60 | Chiarelli et al.[28] | 1989 | Germany | 1.66 | 0.69 | 16 | 2.56 | 1.27 | 45 | Daoxiong et al. [10] | 1999 | China | 1.95 | 0.85 | 65 | 2.02 | 0.96 | 60 | Li et al. [29] | 2012 | China | 1.5092 | 1.3515 | 38 | 2.0213 | 0.9604 | 36 | Lin et al. [14] | 2003 | China | 1.37 | 1.46 | 76 | 1.6 | 1.01 | 62 | Huang and Su [18] | 2016 | China | 4.48 | 1.24 | 63 | 4.46 | 1.31 | 62 | Fan [19] | 2014 | China | 4.08 | 0.28 | 81 | 3.95 | 0.23 | 94 | Xin et al. [37] | 2010 | China | 1.7 | 1.48 | 85 | 1.66 | 0.77 | 118 | Zhao et al. [31] | 2012 | China | 2.49 | 2.73 | 91 | 2.45 | 2.01 | 110 | Wang and Du [20] | 2013 | China | 4.47 | 1.59 | 69 | 4.23 | 1.53 | 74 | Qiao [32] | 2012 | China | 1.38 | 0.86 | 40 | 1.82 | 0.88 | 40 | S. Liu [33] | 2016 | China | 1.27 | 1.04 | 23 | 2.17 | 1.33 | 31 | Chen et al. [34] | 2016 | China | 3.15 | 0.58 | 65 | 3.17 | 0.71 | 65 | Zhang [21] | 2014 | China | 4.49 | 1.61 | 74 | 4.23 | 1.5 | 84 | Ding and Ji [22] | 2011 | China | 1.33 | 0.76 | 30 | 1.43 | 0.82 | 30 |
| rT3 | Ding and Ji [22] | 2011 | China | 1.3 | 0.3 | 30 | 0.83 | 0.17 | 30 | Chiarelli et al.[28] | 1989 | Germany | 0.23 | 0.1 | 16 | 0.22 | 0.07 | 45 | Alexander et al. [27] | 1983 | The United States | 57.8 | 25.3 | 12 | 35.7 | 8.3 | 6 | Schienger.J.B | 1982 | Germany | 25.2 | 3.4 | 8 | 23.5 | 5.4 | 8 | Alexander et al. [6] | 1982 | The United States | 83 | 2 | 4 | 33 | 2 | 35 | Daoxiong et al. [10] | 1999 | China | 0.78 | 0.09 | 65 | 0.52 | 0.1 | 70 |
|
|