Research Article
Metabolic Profile in a Cohort of Young Sicilian Patients with Klinefelter’s Syndrome: The Role of Irisin
Table 1
Comparison of anthropometric, metabolic, and hormonal parameters between patients with Klinefelter’s syndrome and healthy controls.
| | Controls (N = 30) | Patients with KS (N = 25) | |
| | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | | Age (years) | 32.4 ± 7.62 | 32.9 ± 12.2 | 0.886 | BMI (Kg/m2) | 26.26 ± 3.41 | 27.35 ± 7.02 | 0.515 | WC (cm) | 92.78 ± 9.68 | 102,8 ± 18.41 | 0.028 | Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 4.95 ± 0.78 | 4.51 ± 0.95 | 0.064 | HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.48 ± 0.17 | 1.22 ± 0.31 | 0.002 | Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 1.21 ± 0.32 | 1.30 ± 0.87 | 0.599 | LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) | 2.91 ± 0.79 | 2.69 ± 0.77 | 0.303 | GOT (U/l) | 18.4 ± 6.5 | 19 ± 7.74 | 0.716 | GPT (U/l) | 22.3 ± 8.43 | 23.05 ± 13.22 | 0.799 | HbA1c (%) | 5.2 ± 0.38 | 5.48 ± 0.44 | 0.018 | Fasting glucose (mmol/l) | 4.07 ± 0.20 | 4.7 ± 0.79 | 0.388 | Fasting insulin (mUI/l) | 9.42 ± 5.64 | 11.83 ± 6.52 | 0.151 | HOMA index IR | 2.2 ± 1.5 | 7.81 ± 5.57 | <0.01 | ISI-Matsuda | 5.9 ± 3.8 | 1.87 ± 1.29 | <0.01 | Oral disposition index | 2.41 ± 1.32 | −0.75 ± 4.74 | <0.01 | Total testosterone (ng/dl) | 551.41 ± 287.2 | 465.12 ± 319.31 | 0.296 | FSH (mUI/ml) | 5.3 ± 2.9 | 27.75 ± 14.26 | <0.001 | LH (mUI/ml) | 4.01 ± 2.3 | 17.36 ± 9.71 | <0.001 | AMH (ug/l) | 8.5 ± 3.4 | 0.09 ± 0.05 | <0.001 | Inhibin B (ng/l) | 128.4 ± 54.7 | <25 ± 0.01 | <0.001 | PRL (ug/l) | 9.4 ± 5.1 | 12.6 ± 8.08 | 0.784 | E2 (ng/l) | 22.3 ± 3.5 | 30.21 ± 12.23 | 0.001 | Irisin (ng/ml) | 10.28 ± 1.69 | 11.79 ± 1.95 | 0.029 |
|
|
WC, waist circumference; BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; GOT, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; GPT, glutamate pyruvate transaminase’ FSH, follicular stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; PRL, prolactin; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone; E2, 17beta-estrasiol.
|