Comparison of Male and Female Sexual Dysfunction between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study

Zeighami, Shahryar; Dehghankhalili, Saeid; Heiran, Khadije; Azarchehry, Seyede Pegah; Heiran, Alireza; Sayadi, Mehrab; Azadian, Fatemeh

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9404025

International Journal of Endocrinology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Abbreviations Data Availability Ethical Approval Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 9404025 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9404025

Comparison of Male and Female Sexual Dysfunction between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study

Shahryar Zeighami,¹Saeid Dehghankhalili,²Khadije Heiran,³Seyede Pegah Azarchehry,⁴Alireza Heiran,⁵Mehrab Sayadi,⁶and Fatemeh Azadian⁵

Academic Editor: Aman Rajpal

Received10 Oct 2021

Accepted10 Mar 2022

Published18 Apr 2022

Abstract

Background. Maintenance dialysis is the most common treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. One of the most ignored but important health issue among dialysis patients is sexual dysfunction, which interferes with quality of life (QoL). Studies showed that the side effects of the two conventional methods of dialysis (hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD)) are different on a patient’s health. Therefore, we sought to compare the sexual dysfunction score, both male and female, between patients undergoing HD and PD. Methods. One hundred seventy adults (85 HD and 85 PD) subject with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis for at least 2 months were included. For male subjects, the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire was calculated. Moreover, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire was calculated for females. Data were analyzed via SPSS software. Two independent sample t-test with two-sided significance level of 5% was used for comparing the sexual dysfunction score between HD and PD patients. Results. Out of 170 patients with mean age of 49.34 ± 11.7 years, 52.9% were female. Better sexual function scores were obtained in the HD group’s females for desire, orgasm, and satisfaction domains, as well as the total score ( = 0.03, 0.016, 0.02, and 0.039, respectively). The erectile function was significantly better in the PD group’s males (). Conclusion. We found better sexual life in the HD group’s females and PD group’s males. Considering dialysis as a life-long treatment of CKD patients, this part of a patient’s life must be taken seriously by the healthcare providers to choose the most suitable method for patients based on their personalized conditions.

1. Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is projected to increase all over the world. The global prevalence of CKD reported in different studies is heterogeneous. Based on a systematic review in 2016, the global prevalence of CKD was 13.4%. CKD inevitably leads to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which has a high mortality rate [1]. Dialysis is the most common treatment for ESRD patients who cannot undergo renal transplantation [2]. There are two types of dialysis: hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). The dialysis modality is chosen for every patient considering both medical and nonmedical factors [3]. Hemodialysis should be performed by a healthcare professional. In this type, blood is pumped out of the body to an artificial kidney machine. The machine drains blood, bathes it in a special dialysate solution, removing waste substances and fluid, and after that, returns it to the patient’s bloodstream. Hemodialysis is usually performed several times a week and lasts for 3–5 hours. Muscle cramps and hypotension are possible hemodialysis complications [4]. In peritoneal dialysis, a catheter will be placed in the patient’s belly and the peritoneum acts as a natural filter [5]. Unlike HD, no specialized in-patient equipment is required and PD can be done at home [6, 7]. Dialysis imposes a high cost on the healthcare system. Based on a comprehensive study, in low and middle-income countries, the annual average cost per patient for HD is about $30,079 and $ 28,592.45 for PD. The cost to society has a wide spectrum, consisted of direct medical hospital, direct nonmedical, and indirect cost [8]. Generally, dialysis patients face several physical, psychological, and social issues that can have lasting effects on their life [2]. One of the unaddressed issues is sexual dysfunction, which is defined as lack of or decrease in sexual desire and difficulty with sexual arousal, pain during intercourse, or orgasmic dysfunction, whether organic or physiologic [9–11]. This is frequently observed in dialysis patients and ranged 41–93%, which poses multifactorial etiology, including hormonal imbalance, vascular and neurogenic dysfunctions, depression, and using antihypertensive (i.e., beta-adrenergic antagonist and diuretics) and antidepressant drugs. [12, 13]. Maintenance dialysis is a life-long treatment, and this is very likely to endanger the occupational, familial, and social status of a dialysis patient [14]. Also, several studies suggest that sexual dysfunction drastically interferes with quality of life (QoL), since any changes in sexual activity affect the person’s perception of health. Studies showed that the side effects of the two conventional methods of dialysis are different on a patient’s sexual health. Moreover, there is a huge difference between the procedures of HD and PD, and all these factors might have various effects on different aspects of people’s personal lives [15]. Therefore, we sought to compare the sexual dysfunction prevalence between ESRD patients, both male and female, undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

2. Materials and Methods

In this cross-sectional analytical study, 190 adults (85 HD and 85 PD subjects) with ESRD being on dialysis who were admitted in (HD patients) or had follow-up at (PD patients) Namazi and Ali-Asghar Hospitals, affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, were included. A subject was included using purposeful convenience sampling if aged 15–65 years, being on dialysis for at least 2 months, and had no any other organ failure. Subjects were excluded if did not undergo dialysis at least twice a week (n = 6), were illiterate (n = 0), used medications affecting sexual function (n = 5), or underwent massive surgeries or other organs’ failure (n = 9). The data gathering form consisted of demographic variables, underlying the cause of CKD, duration of CKD, dialysis duration and number of sessions per week, selected laboratory markers, comorbidities, surgical history, and drug history. Two widely used sexual function questionnaires were utilized in this study. For male subjects, the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire was calculated. The Persian version of this questionnaire has been used in hemodialysis patients previously [16]. Also, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was calculated from the questionnaire [17].

Qualitative and quantitative variables were described using frequency (%) and mean ± standard deviation (SD) (or median (interquartile range (IQR))), respectively. Group comparison was done by Pearson’s chi-square test for qualitative variables and the independent t-test or Mann–Whitney U test if normal distribution was not present. Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (Version 16.0. for Windows, Chicago, SPSS Inc). value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

A total of 170 patients (mean age of 49.34 ± 11.7 year; 52.9% female) were eligible for data analysis. Baseline data comparison between HD and PD groups is given in Table 1. Gender, age, BMI, prevalence of diabetes, prevalence of hypertension, marriage duration, and disease duration were not statistically different ( = 0.999, 0.092, 0.996, 1.000, 0.438, 0.297, and 0.784, respectively). But PD patients had statistically higher rates of smoking history () and surgical history (). In addition, HD patients were on dialysis for a longer time, compared to the PD patients ().

Laboratory data are given in Table 2, in which they were not significant differences in terms of blood glucose, creatinine, hemoglobin, platelet, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. Only the BUN level was significantly higher in the PD group ().

We compared FSFI scores and EF scores of IIEF between HD and PD groups, separately (Table 3). In females (FSFI scores), all scores were higher, better sexual function, in HD group; although, scores reached a significant level just for desire, orgasm, and satisfaction domains, as well as the total score ( = 0.03, 0.016, 0.02, and 0.039, respectively). In males (EF scores), erectile function was significantly better in the PD group ().

4. Discussion

Disturbance in sexual function is a serious and prevalent complication among CKD patients which imposes harmful effects on their QoL. Based on previous studies, more than 80% of dialysis patients with chronic renal failure complain of erectile dysfunction [18–20], and a high percent of women treated with dialysis experience impaired sexual function [21]. Erectile dysfunction in men is associated with some diseases [22].

Sexual dysfunction in women unlike men is subjective and more complicated and its treatment remains challenging [23]. To get a more comprehensive view and evaluate sexual dysfunction among CKD patients, we compared sexual function among male and female patients in two groups of HD and PD. The findings of this study showed that among men, erectile function was better in peritoneal groups; however, FSFI’s score in women treated with hemodialysis was higher indicating a better sexual function in this group.

Few studies have compared sexual dysfunction between HD and PD patients. Wu et al. [24] reported that after a year, patients on HD had better sexual function than those on PD. Based on a study conducted by Toorians et al. [25], prevalence of sexual dysfunction was 100% in HD and 67% in PD. Also, Guan et al. [26] showed that the prevalence of SD was similar between patients on HD and PD. Moreover, Basok et al. [27] showed that the rates of sexual dysfunction were about 81% and 67% in the PD and HD patients.

Pathophysiology of sexual dysfunction in dialysis patients is complex. Therefore, we need to consider different parameters according to gender, age, underlying conditions (especially diabetes and hypertension as the most common causes of ESRD), as well as personality and psychological status of every patient to choose the suitable method of dialysis. Many studies have proved that this problem, besides anticipated factors, is strongly associated with factors such as stress, depression, and sleep disorders [28–30]. The result of this study showed that the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in PD and HD patients is different between genders pointing to the importance of considering specific dimensions and individual parameters.

Sexual dysfunction is a common problem in the female dialysis population. Dialysis imposes negative effects on different aspects of patients’ life and generally decreases their QoL and causes sleep disorder and depression [28]. A great percentage of uremic women complain of decrease in libido and pain during intercourse [31]. Azevedo et al. claimed that the women with impaired sexual function had lower serum creatinine and phosphate level that can show association with nutritional status [32]. Guan et al. reported that the main risk factors for decreased libido and lack of orgasm in CKD female patients are anemia, depression, and using beta-blockers [26].

Studies demonstrated that the increased calcium level is associated with sexual dysfunction in male undergoing PD referring to the vascular etiology of erectile impairment [32]. The reproductive hormonal disturbance is the other reason for erectile dysfunction [16]. In one study, about 34% of patients had low serum testosterone levels [32]. Therefore, controlling these parameters can help patients to improve their sexual functions. The present study had a major limitation as we did not assess the just-mentioned laboratory parameters.

From clinical point of view, the exact role of dialysis on sexual dysfunction is not still clear. First, major underlying conditions of dialysis patients, i.e., hypertension and diabetes, can develop sexual dysfunction through vasculopathy and neuropathy; hence, a synergistic mechanism would be plausible. Second, the mean duration of dialysis was more than 10 years. So, we were not able to track the early effects of dialysis on sexual dysfunction. Third, on the other hand, dialysis can increase appetite (normal BMI in our sample population) and decrease blood urea nitrogen levels, which theoretically might pose a positive effect on sexual dysfunction. By and large, a prospective cohort study on new dialysis patients who are investigated for baseline sexual function would elucidate this question. Besides, diabetes and hypertension pandemics in this millennium are accompanied with the increase of dialysis patients. Therefore, there is an upcoming need to maintain quality of life in this population. A baseline simplified sexual function survey can be part of clinical evaluation for this program.

Apart from being a single center study with a small number of patients, this study was limited by lack of data about ratio of patients with uncontrolled diabetes or anemia, as well as use of supplemental testosterone or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) such as PDE5 inhibitors and estrogen. Of note, psychosocial parameters can elaborate on sexual function. For example, it is shown that economic status can be associated to the presence of sexual dysfunction in noncommunicable diseases [33].

More studies are warranted to evaluate more physiologic, social, and psychologic parameters to gain a better and comprehensive grasp of this phenomenon in dialysis patients. Noticeably, future studies must consider reliable and specialized tools in these patients. For example, the correlation of hbA1c with glycemic control is questioned in both hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients, that is, several adjustments should be considered by physicians to correctly interpret the result of hbA1c [34]. In addition, no sexual dysfunction questionnaire has been specifically designed for dialysis patients. To our knowledge, general questionnaires such as FSFI, SF-36, CHEQ (“CHOICE study” Health Experience Questionnaire including SF-36 and 14 dialysis-specific domains), and IIEF have been utilized by in-line studies, so far [24, 27]. For future research studies as well as clinical purposes, both simplified and extended specialized questionnaires should be constructed.

5. Conclusion

Sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent among CKD male and female patients treated with both HD and PD. Dialysis patients suffer from several problems such as diet restrictions, financial problems, sexual dysfunction, worries about their marriage, and change in their responsibilities in their personal life. These problems, especially sexual dysfunction, affect patients’ QoL. Considering dialysis as a life-long treatment, this part of a patient’s life must be taken seriously by the healthcare system. We should try to choose the most suitable method for patients based on their personality and individual conditions. Healthcare systems should be sensitive to detect this problem in dialysis patients and try to improve the sexual function in patients by choosing effective treatments.

Abbreviations

CKD:	Chronic kidney disease
ED:	Erectile dysfunction
ESRD:	End-stage renal disease
FSFI:	Female Sexual Function Index
D:	Hemodialysis
IIEF:	International Index of Erectile Function
PD:	Peritoneal dialysis.

Data Availability

The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical Approval

The present study is in conformity with the Helsinki Declaration and has approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences with approval code: IR.SUMS.MED.REC.1398.461.

Disclosure

The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

SZ, FA, and MS contributed substantially to the design of the study. SPA, SD, and KH acquired data. AH and MS had roles in data interpretation. SZ, FA, and AH wrote the draft. All the authors reviewed the manuscript critically.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by vice-chancellor in research affairs of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

References

N. R. Hill, S. T. Fatoba, J. L. Oke et al., “Global prevalence of chronic kidney disease-a systematic review and meta-analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 7, Article ID e0158765, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Afshar, S. Sanavi, and J. Salimi, “Epidemiology of chronic renal failure in Iran: a four year single- center experience,” Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation:An Official Publication of the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Saudi Arabia, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 191–4, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
C. T. Chan, P. J. Blankestijn, L. M. Dember et al., “Dialysis initiation, modality choice, access, and prescription: conclusions from a kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) controversies conference,” Kidney International, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Yarar, A. K. Cheung, P. Sakiewicz et al., “Ultrafiltration method for measuring vascular access flow rates during hemodialysis,” Kidney International, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1129–1135, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ponce Gabriel, G. V. R. Nascimento, J. Teixeira Caramori, L. Cuadrado Martim, P. Barretti, and A. Luís Balbi, “Peritoneal dialysis in acute renal failure,” Renal Failure, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 451–456, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Roxe, F. del Greco, J. Hughes et al., “Hemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis: results of a 3-year prospective controlled study,” Kidney International, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 341–348, 1981.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Niang, A. Iyengar, and V. A. Luyckx, “Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis in resource-limited settings,” Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 463–471, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Mushi, P. Marschall, and S. FleBa, “The cost of dialysis in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 506, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Basson, J. Berman, A. Burnett et al., “Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications,” Journal of Urology, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 888–893, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Doss and N. Polaschek, “Assessing sexual dysfunction in people living on dialysis in a New Zealand renal service,” Renal Society of Australasia Journal, vol. 8, pp. 104–108, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
A. R. Nissenson and R. N. Fine, Dialysis Therapy, Hanley & Belfus, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2002.
S. E. Rosas, M. Joffe, E. Franklin et al., “Prevalence and determinants of erectile dysfunction in hemodialysis patients,” Kidney International, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 2259–2266, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lew-Starowicz and R. Gellert, “The sexuality and quality of life of hemodialyzed patients-ASED multicenter study,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1062–1071, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Enkvist, H. Ekström, and S. Elmståhl, “What factors affect life satisfaction (LS) among the oldest-old?” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 140–145, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Czyżewski, J. Sańko-Resmer, J. Wyzgał, and A. Kurowski, “Assessment of health-related quality of life of patients after kidney transplantation in comparison with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis,” Annals of Transplantation, vol. 19, pp. 576–585, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Türk, G. Karalezli, H. Z. Tonbul et al., “Erectile dysfunction and the effects of sildenafil treatment in patients on haemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation:Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association-European Renal Association, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1818–1822, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Malekmakan, S. Shakeri, S. Haghpanah, M. Pakfetrat, A. S. Sarvestani, and A. Malekmakan, “Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction in hemodialysis patients using IIEF questionnaire,” Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation:An Official Publication of the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Saudi Arabia, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 232–236, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Rosen, C. Brown, J. Heiman et al., “The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function,” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 191–208, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Arslan, G. Aslan, A. Sifil et al., “Sexual dysfunction in male patients on hemodialysis: assessment with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF),” International Journal of Impotence Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 539–542, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Saglimbene, P. Natale, S. Palmer et al., “The prevalence and correlates of low sexual functioning in women on hemodialysis: a multinational, cross-sectional study,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 6, Article ID e0179511, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sayadi, R. Elmafshar, I. Razeghian-Jahromi, and M. J. Zibaeenezhad, “Detection of coronary artery disease by an erectile dysfunction questionnaire,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2021, Article ID 6647995, 6 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Rathi and R. Ramachandran, “Sexual and gonadal dysfunction in chronic kidney disease: pathophysiology,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 214, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. W. Wu, N. E. Fink, J. V. Marsh-Manzi et al., “Changes in quality of life during hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis treatment: generic and disease specific measures,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 743–753, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Toorians, E. Janssen, E. Laan et al., “Chronic renal failure and sexual functioning: clinical status versus objectively assessed sexual response,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation: Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association-European Renal Association, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2654–2663, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Guan, J.-M. Fan, W.-D. Zhang et al., “Sexual dysfunction in female patients with chronic renal insufficiency,” Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 555–558, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
E. K. Basok, N. Atsu, M. M. Rifaioglu, G. Kantarci, A. Yildirim, and R. Tokuc, “Assessment of female sexual function and quality of life in predialysis, peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis, and renal transplant patients,” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 473–481, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Eghbali, N. Shahqolian, F. Nazari, and S. Babaee, “Comparing problems of patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis referring to medical university’s hospitals,” Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, vol. 14, no. 1, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
S. D. Weisbord, “Sexual dysfunction and quality of life in patients on maintenance dialysis,” Seminars in Dialysis, Wiley Online Library, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S. E. Rosas, M. Joffe, E. Franklin et al., “Association of decreased quality of life and erectile dysfunction in hemodialysis patients,” Kidney International, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 232–238, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Azevedo, R. Santos, J. Durães et al., “Sexual dysfunction in men and women on peritoneal dialysis: differential link with metabolic factors and quality of life perception,” Nefrologia:publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola Nefrologia, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 703–709, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Yazici, L. Altintepe, I. Guney et al., “Female sexual dysfunction in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients,” Renal Failure, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 360–364, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Rusiecki, R. Zdrojowy, J. Gebala et al., “The influence of socioeconomic status on the presence and degree of erectile dysfunction in men with coronary artery disease-a cross-sectional study,” American Journal of Men’s Health, vol. 13, pp. 1–10, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Coelho and A. Rodrigues, “Hemoglobin A1c in patients on peritoneal dialysis: how should we interpret it?” Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 375–382, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Coelho, “What is the role of HbA1c in diabetic hemodialysis patients?” Seminars in Dialysis, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 19–23, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Shahryar Zeighami et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies