Microporous MOF-5@AC and Cu-BDC@AC Composite Materials for Methane Storage in ANG Technology

Table 2

Comparison of the methane adsorption capacity of the synthesized adsorbents with others.

MOFs	Framework density Dc (g/cm^3)	BET surface area (m^2/g)	Total uptake			Conditions pressure (bar)/temperature (K)	References
			(cm^3/cm^3)	(cm^3/g)	(mmol/g)
MOF-905	0.549	3490	145	264	11.78	35/298	[40]
LIFM-82	0.922	1624	196	214	9.55	35/298	[40]
NU-125	0.589	3286	182	315	14.06	35/298	[40]
AC1	0.5	1060.3	—	—	5.11	35/298	[10]
AC2	0.58	363.3	—	—	3.06	35/298	[10]
AC3	0.39	1177.7	—	—	7.92	35/298	[10]
AC4	0.49	1050.8	—	—	5.18	35/298	[10]
LIFM-83	0.917	1715	192	—	9.36	35/298	[41]
MOF-5	0.59	1870	135	228	10.18	36/298	[14]
IR-MOF1	0.59	—	128.29	217.45	9.71	35/298	[42]
MOF-5	0.61	—	135	221	9.87	35/298	[15]
MOF-5	0.593	—	110	185	8.28	35/298	[43]
CMK-3	0.87	950	—	117.33	5.2	35/298	[44]
Cu-BDC	—	624	—	—	3.8	35/298	[45]
Cu-BDC	—	603	—	—	11.58	35/293	[46]
MIL-53(Cu)/CNT	—	1123			13.72	35/298	[47]
Mn(HCO2)2/graphite	—	280			4.24	1/298	[48]
MOF-540% @AC	—	711	—	—	7.3	35/298	This study
MOF-510% @AC	—	—	—	—	5.9	35/298	This study
Cu-BDC40% @AC	—	657	—	—	6.85	35/298	This study
Cu-BDC10% @AC	—	—	—	—	5.59	35/298	This study
Pure activated carbon	—	815	—	—	4.32	35/298	This study
MOF-5	—	760	—	—	8.18	35/298	This study
Cu-BDC	—	633	—	—	7.74	35/298	This study