Research Article

Effects of Metal-Support Interactions and Interfaces on Catalytic Performance over M2O3- (, Al-) Supported Ni Catalysts

Table 2

Comparison of the catalytic performances with previously reported catalysts.

ReferencesCatalyst and its specific surface area (m2/g)Temperature of reaction (°C)/molar ratio of water to carbonGHSV ethanol-water vapor (mL/gcat·h)Inactivation rate of activity (%)a/time on stream (h)Rate of carbon deposit (mg/gcat·h)

[29]Ni15LaSn950 (62)650/4.5410001/800.78
[30]1CeNi/SBA-15 (538)650/45700010/501.6
[31]Ni-1Ce/MMT (67.2)650/28.9/50
[19]Meso-3LaNiAl (202)600/2570000/502.28
[32]Ni-0.25Sn/CeO2 (7.3)600/5570005/20
[33]Ni/Ce0.8Zr0.2 (85)600/2.56000010/1027
[34]Ni/La2O3-α-Al2O3 (33.9)700/6138000/42.6
[35]Ir/CeO2 (148)650/1.51800035/300
[36]Ni-Ce-La (76)550/3774210/601
[37]Ni/10 mg-ATP (356.7)700/1.5192002/506.1
[38]Ni/MgO (28)650/4.28000042/242.4
[20]Ni-CeO2 (29.4)600/25592017.1/502.6
This workNi-La2O3 (23.3)600/2559206.1/503.0