Research Article

Technoeconomic Analysis of a Wind Power Generation System and Wind Resource Mapping Using GIS Tools: The Case of Twelve Locations in the Commune of Evodoula, Cameroon

Table 11

Summary of technical performance results, economic viability, and annual reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at 100 m (AGL) using a single NORDEX N100-2.5MW wind turbine rated at 2.5 MW next to a configuration layout of one even row from to of an onshore wind farm with an installed capacity of 12.5 MW for the location of Okok.

Locations where wind turbines are installedLatitude (m)Longitude (m)Elevation (m)Wind speed, Vm (m/s)AEP Gross (GWh/year)AEP Net (GWh/year)Loss rate proportional due to the effect wake (%)Cost production unitary (CPU) (CAD$/kWh)Present value cost (PVC) (CAD$)Net present value (NPV) (CAD$)Gross annual GHG emission reduction (tCO2/year)Net annual GHG emission reduction (tCO2/year)
Wind turbine 1 (WT1)457000.0445838217749000.10765067554873.031000427.250000640.87506133.3333390.00003421789.752074435795.0414876940.248125115410.38317
Wind turbine 2 (WT2)457000.0445838217750000.04766290874953.031000427.250000640.87500033.3333330.00003421789.750000435795.0000076940.248125115410.37218
Wind turbine 3 (WT3)457000.0445838217751000.00132507165003.030992427.236816640.85455333.3332630.00003421789.054802435781.0960476937.873917115406.69004
Wind turbine 4 (WT4)457000.0445838217751999.88195571575013.031279426.604553639.91383533.3340630.00003421757.070390435141.4078076824.014415115237.28319
Wind turbine 5 (WT5)457000.0445838217752999.88078546625093.031862425.833923638.75567633.3338330.00003421717.6929844343538.596876685.237438115028.71902
Total annual energy production (AEP), annual wake loss rate (WLR), annual cost production unitary (CPU) per kilowatt-hour, present value of annual costs (PVC), annual net present value (NPV), and total annual reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the onshore wind farm by 12.5 MW over 1 year

The 12.5 MW onshore wind farm-Total AEP Gross (GWh/year)Total AEP Net (GWh/year)Rate losses due to the effect wake (%)Total cost production unitary (CPU) (CAD$/kWh)Total present value cost (PVC) (CAD$)Total net present value (NPV) (CAD$)Total Gross annual GHG emission reduction (tCO2/year)Total Net annual GHG emission reduction (tCO2/year)
-2134.1752923201.27412533.3335660.00017544216.6012510884332.025384327.62202159576493.44761531
Total energy production (TEP), total wake loss ratio (WLR), total cost production unitary (CPU) per kilowatt-hour, present value of total costs (PVC), total net present value (NPV), and reduction of total greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) of the onshore wind farm by 12.5 MW over 20 years

The 12.5 MW onshore wind farm-TEP Gross (TWh)TEP Net (TWh)Rate losses of to the effect of wake (%)Cost production unitary (CPU) (CAD$/kWh)Present value cost (PVC) (CAD$ million)Net present value (NPV) (CAD$ million)Gross annual GHG emission reduction (million tCO2)Net annual GHG emission reduction (million tCO2)
-42.6835058464.025482533.33356630.003410884332.025217686640.57686552.440431811529868.952306