Response Surface Approach to Optimize the Conditions of Foam Mat Drying of Plum in relation to the Physical-Chemical and Antioxidant Properties of Plum Powder

Table 1

Central composite face center design corresponding responses, foam density (g/cm³), foam expansion (%), and foam porosity (g/cm³) with albumin (%) and time (min).

Run no.	egg albumin	whipping time	Response foam density	Response foam expansion	Response foam porosity
1	4.00	10.00	924.090	971.740	618.208
2	4.00	15.00	1010.474	872.857	573.617
3	6.00	15.00	388.300	531.303	338.821
4	4.00	5.00	898.352	744.976	485.618
5	4.00	10.00	629.246	789.982	393.355
6	4.00	10.00	787.721	807.360	405.800
7	2.00	15.00	737.156	828.609	541.833
8	4.00	10.00	993.506	967.091	522.293
9	4.00	10.00	925.705	925.803	533.739
10	2.00	5.00	633.823	690.676	349.856
11	6.00	5.00	1065.628	985.797	650.200
12	2.00	10.00	756.961	806.585	531.764
13	6.00	10.00	919.060	924.976	591.927