Characterization, Functional Properties, and Resistant Starch of Freshwater Macrophytes

Table 3

Resistant and nonresistant starch of the present study in comparison with other previous studies.

Species/part	Resistant starch (%)	Nonresistant starch (%)	References
C. esculenta corm			Present study
E. dulcis corm			Present study
S. sagittifolia corm			Present study
T. bispinosa seed			Present study
T. angustifolia rhizome			Present study
T. angustifolia pollen			Present study
N. nucifera seed			Present study
N. nucifera rhizome			Present study
Previous studies
Aquatic macrophytes starch
C. esculenta	1.99	—	[43]
C. esculenta	2.11	—	[43]
C. esculenta	2.26	—	[43].
C. esculenta	35.19	35.73	[44]
C. esculenta	44.10	—	[36]
C. esculenta	27.50	—	[36]
C. esculenta	4.12	59.61	[45]
Trapa sp.	41.50	—	[36]
Trapa sp.	36.80	—	[36]
E. dulcis	8.05	—	[36]
N. nucifera rhizome	2.10	—	[36]
N. nucifera seed	19.70	—	[36]
Commercialized starch
Dioscorea alata	22.48	18.85	[44]
Ipomea batatas	0.97	75.55	[44]
I. batatas	28.90	—	[36]
I. batatas	3.19	49.35	[45]
Zea mays	7.83	—	[36]
Solanum tuberosum	79.30	—	[36]
Manihot esculenta	80.80		[36]
M. esculenta	9.69	55.99	[45]
Oryza sativa (waxy)	2.72	72.04	[45]

Data are mean values of , and different superscripts (a>b>c>d>e>f) are significantly different (DMRT, ).