Research Article
The Use of D-Optimal Mixture Design in Optimizing Formulation of a Nutraceutical Hard Candy
Table 4
The effect of different combinations studied.
| Term | Estimation | Standard error | ratio | |
| (a) | | 3.730 | 0.155 | 24.03 | <0.0001 | | 5.121 | 0.372 | 13.76 | <0.0001 | | −2.271 | 0.307 | −7.40 | 0.0003 | | −1.378 | 0.372 | −3.70 | 0.0100 | (b) | | 3.647 | 0.169 | 21.49 | <0.0001 | | 5.322 | 0.407 | 13.08 | <0.0001 | | −2.752 | 0.335 | −8.20 | 0.0002 | | −1.344 | 0.407 | −3.30 | 0.0164 | (c) | | 4.408 | 0.140 | 31.57 | <0.0001 | | 3.083 | 0.335 | 9.21 | <0.0001 | | −1.917 | 0.335 | −5.73 | 0.0012 | | −0.861 | 0.276 | −3.12 | 0.0206 | (d) | | 3.790 | 0.128 | 29.68 | <0.0001 | | 4.440 | 0.306 | 14.50 | <0.0001 | | −3.227 | 0.252 | −12.79 | <0.0001 | | 0.274 | 0.306 | 0.90 | 0.405 | (e) | | 3.048 | 0.194 | 15.72 | <0.0001 | | 6.508 | 0.465 | 14.00 | <0.0001 | | −0.991 | 0.465 | −2.13 | 0.077 | | 1.362 | 0.383 | 0.95 | 0.381 | (f) | | 3.738 | 0.246 | 15.16 | <0.0001 | | 4.874 | 0.591 | 8.25 | <0.0002 | | −1.950 | 0.487 | −4.00 | 0.0071 | | −1.793 | 0.591 | −3.03 | 0.0230 |
|
|