Evaluating the Antioxidant Properties of Unifloral Honey (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L.) from Ethiopia

Tesfaye, Ofijan

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7664957

International Journal of Food Science

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 7664957 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7664957

Evaluating the Antioxidant Properties of Unifloral Honey (Apis mellifera L.) from Ethiopia

Ofijan Tesfaye¹

Academic Editor: Mohamad Djaeni

Received31 Mar 2023

Revised01 Jun 2023

Accepted28 Jun 2023

Published15 Jul 2023

Abstract

The antioxidant properties of natural honey primarily rely on the floral origin from which nectar is collected by bees. Thus, the current activity evaluated the antioxidant properties of honey based on its floral type. The honey floral origin was verified by the melissopalynological technique. Antioxidant properties were determined by using standard procedures and analyzed by SAS. Six unifloral honey types with their harvesting month were identified. Accordingly, Guizotia (74% of pollen frequency), Coffea arabica (68%), Vernonia (90%), Croton macrostachyus (64%), Schefflera abyssinica (100%), and Eucalyptus (100%) were cropped in November, February, February, May, April, and June separately. Statistically, a variation () in antioxidant parameters was displayed between unifloral honeys. Vernonia honey exhibited the maximum total phenol (), total flavonoid (), and total antioxidant content (). On the other hand, S. abyssinica honey recorded the least total phenol content (), total flavonoid content (), and total antioxidant content (). Statistical analysis showed a positive correlation between all the tested antioxidant parameters. Thus, the current study indicated that all the tested Ethiopian unifloral honey had good sources of antioxidants with the most Vernonia honey followed by C. macrostachyus whereas S. abyssinica honey had the least followed by Eucalyptus.

1. Introduction

Free radicals are formed in our body during a chemical reaction and lead to damage our cell. It's inhibited by antioxidants produced during our daily natural food. As indicated by Wu and Cederbaum [1], free radicals are too sensitive as they form a bond with other substances, particles, or individual electrons to produce a constant compound and reactive oxygen species take place. This causes many diseases like the formation of cancer, infection, getting old, pathogenesis and development of diabetes [2], circulatory illness, immunity failure, degenerative diseases of the nervous system , heart and lung diseases, and eye problem [3]. Eating natural antioxidants from natural products like honey is active in the hindrance of prolonged illnesses that have amplified in current time [2, 4].

Honey is a normal nutritive antioxidant whose composition is accountable for the redox properties, namely, flavonoids, phenols, enzymes, vitamins, and minerals [5]. Honey is synthesized by bees either from a single plant (its honey is called unifloral honey) or multiple plant species (its honey is known to be multifloral honey), and honey antioxidant activities are determined by its plant and geographical origin, humidity, temperature, climate, and environment condition [6]. The unifloral and multifloral honey sample is authenticated by the melissopalynological method, and taxon of the pollen is typically used to point out the plant nectar origin collected by bees to synthesize honey [7]. Ethiopia has more than ten million colonies, and above eight hundred recognized bee plant [8]. Moreover, the suitability of geographical position, plant diversity, and climatic conditions in Ethiopia makes the topmost honey producer in Africa and tenth from the worldwide [9]. The goal of this work was to screen the antioxidant properties of unifloral honey harvested in Ethiopia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Assortment

It was collected as of different areas of the country based on the accessibility of unifloral honey, and their latitude and longitude are indicated in Table 1. Accordingly, C. arabica and C. macrostachyus honey from Haro Sebu, Guizotia honey from Nejo, Vernonia honey from Gedo, Eucalyptus honey from Holota, and S. abyssinica honey from Bore were collected from farmer beekeepers' apiary site based on their honey harvesting calendar. An overall 30 kg (sample size) of honey trials for each unifloral honey type, from 30 dissimilar apicultures (around 1 kg per farmer) of the study site, has taken. Then after, the representative trials were transported to the University of Addis Ababa, Lab. of Food Science, using sterilized beaker. At the time of cropping, visual remarking of hive environs was done besides group discussion with skilled apicultures of every site to acquire the nectar origin of the samples and flowering bee plants available in the site.

2.2. Floral Source Analysis

The technique of Louveaux et al. [7] was used. Hence, 10 g of honey was added in 20 mL of sterile distilled water. The honey solution was centrifuged at 3800 rpm for 10 minutes, and the supernatant was poured out. Then, 20 mL of distilled water was again added to completely dissolve the remaining sugar crystals and centrifuged at 3800 rpm again for 5 minutes, and the supernatant was removed completely. The sediment was spread evenly using a sterile micro spatula on the microscope slide, and the sample was dried for a while. Thereafter, one drop of glycerin jelly was added to the coverslip, and the pollen grains were identified using a pollen atlas [8] which was prepared for plant identification from honey sample. Moreover, pollen morphology types were verified by comparison with reference slides of pollen assorted directly from the live flower plants in the study area. Then after, bee plant species from honey sample was identified; their contribution to bees (pollen, nectar, or both) and life form was known at field and different literatures [7, 8]. The percentage of pollen types in each honey sample was calculated based on the total number of different types of pollen grains counted in each sample. Accordingly, if >45% of counted pollen grain was from specific plant species, it was categorized under predominant pollen (monofloral honey); if 16-45%, secondary pollen; if 3-15%, important minor pollen; and if <3%, minor pollen, while honey sample with no predominant pollen was used as mixed honey type [7]. The pollen count was determined under a light microscope (Swift Instrument International, serial number 8750038, Japan, high power 400x) linked to a computer.

2.3. Antioxidant Properties of Honey

2.3.1. Total Phenolic Contents

The phenol content of unifloral honey was assessed by the Folin-Ciocalteu method [5]. Honey stock solution was formed by dissolving 2 g of the honey in 25 mL of distilled water and strained by Whatman no. 1. Then, 0.5 mL aliquot from stock solution was mixed with 2.5 mL of 0.2 N Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and stored for 5 min. A 2 mL of 75 g/L sodium carbonate solution was added to the solution and incubated for 2 h at 25°C. Finally, the absorbance of the mixture was calculated at 765 nm using UV (PerkinElmer Lambda 950 UV/VIS/NIR Spectrophotometer). A standard chemical taken to create a calibration curve was gallic acid (0-200 mg/L) as a control. Lastly, composition of total phenol was stated as milligrams of gallic acid per one hundred grams of honey from an average result of triplicate data. The calibration formula (; ) was derived from the calibration curve (Figure 1).

2.3.2. Total Flavonoid Content (TPC)

The procedure by Chua et al. [5] was used. For this, a mixture of 5 g honey in 50 mL distilled water was used as a honey stock solution, and out of this, 5 mL was dropped in 5 mL of 2% AlCl₃ solution and incubated for 10 minutes. Then, its absorbance was read at 415 nm by spectrophotometer. Then, for calibration curve formulation, a standard chemical which is quercetin (0-200 mg/L) as a control was chosen. This procedure was triplicated and stated as milligrams of quercetin per 100 grams of honey from the averaged result of triplicate data. The calibration equation (; ) was derived from the calibration curve (Figure 2).

2.3.3. The Antioxidant Composition

It was founded by calculating the ascorbic acid equal antioxidant capacity (AAEAC) using usual procedures [10]. For this, 0.5 milligrams of DPPH was dissolved in twenty-five millilitres of methanol to get DPPH solution. As well, 30 mg of honey was mixed in millilitre methanol. Then after, 0.75 mL honey solution was mixed in 1.5 mL of DPPH solution. After the solution was incubated at room temperature for 15 min, its absorbance was measured at 517 nm. A mixture of 0.75 mL of a methanolic honey solution with 1.5 mL of methanol was used as a blank. A calibration curve was produced from a standard chemical: ascorbic acid (0-200 mg/L) (control). The procedure was triplicated and stated as milligrams of ascorbic acid per 100 grams of honey. The calibration equation (; ) was derived from the calibration curve (Figure 3).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Average and standard deviations were calculated using SAS Software. Significant variation between unifloral honeys was determined using one-way ANOVA. Antioxidant parameters were used for mean separation by least significant difference.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Floral Source Result

All floral honey source with their characteristics such as harvesting time, life form, and resource released for bees and pollen frequency category is depicted in Table 2. Pollen pictures of bee floras that provide unifloral honey are illustrated in Figure 4. All the time, honey sample includes various pollen grains which provide a good fingerprint of the geographical and botanical origin where the nectar is collected from [11]. After the pollen grain was counted and the percentage calculated, all honey types were categorized as unifloral honey since their pollen frequency was greater than 45%. Accordingly, there are six unifloral honey types, namely, (1) Guizotia honey from the Nedjo area harvested through November, (2) C. arabica honey from the Haro Sebu area harvested through February, (3) Vernonia honey from Gedo harvested through February, (4) C. macrostachyus from Haro Sebu area harvested through May, (5) S. abyssinica honey from Bore harvested through April, and (6) Eucalyptus honey from Holota harvested through June. The percentage pollen frequency from Guizotia, C. arabica, Vernonia, C. macrostachyus, S. abyssinica, and Eucalyptus honey samples was 74, 68, 90, 64, 100, and 100, respectively (Figure 5).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Similarly, in Ethiopia, Guizotia, Vernonia, C. arabica, and S. abyssinica honeys are harvested from November to December, February, February through March, and April through May [12], respectively. Not all flowering plants equally contribute to the bees. Nectar quality (sugar content), potentiality, and abundance of the plant in a given area contribute to cropping a unifloral honey (predominant pollen source). From this study, secondary pollen contributor (Vernonia plant) has occurred in C. arabica honey. The study area is well known in coffee production and when flowered is abundantly found and stays for a short period of flowering (less than 10 days). This is concurrent with [13] who observed an overlapping of the Vernonia plant flowering period with C. arabica from honey samples harvested from February through March.

3.2. Antioxidant Properties

3.2.1. Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

The present study screened honey samples between plant sources, and a very significant disparity () of TPC was obtained in all the tested honey types. TPC is articulated as milligrams of gallic acid per 100 g of honey. It ranged from a mean of by S. abyssinica to by Vernonia (Table 3). The current result is that the indication of Vernonia honey has a high antioxidant content followed by C. macrostachyus while S. abyssinica honey is a weak antioxidant compound content.

The total phenol substance in honey is examined by TPC which is a fast and simple technique [5]. Moreover, Al et al. [14] demonstrated that TPC was an adequate parameter for an overall phenol approximation in honey and is directly interconnected to the antioxidant action of honey. Furthermore, number of phenols found in the honey sample highly relies on the floral source from which honey is synthesized and is one of the greatest vital classes of substances existing in honey [15].

The TPC of the current study is less than that of Malaysian honey (110.4-196.5 milligram GAE in hundred gram honey) [5] and Sudanese honey ( milligram GAE in hundred gram honey) [16]. However, it is found higher than in Germany (4.6 mg/100 g honey) [17] and Slovenia (4.48 mg GAE/100 g honey) [18]. This finding was found within the reported ranges of Northeast Brazilian honey (27.0 to 92.7 mg GAE/100 g) [19] and Ethiopian honey ( mg GAE/kg to mg GAE/kg) [20]. Nevertheless, as in my study, comparable and higher TPC was investigated by V. amygdalina ( mg GAE/kg) followed by C. macrostachyus ( mg GAE/kg) [20] which is an observer of phenolic content in honey is an indication of its floral source. On the other side, the difference in TPC might be due to floral and environmental origin, method of honey harvesting, duration of honey storage, laboratory procedure, and chemical and reagents used during the laboratory analysis.

3.2.2. Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)

It is stated as milligrams of quercetin per 100 g of honey. The presence of flavonoid significantly contributes to the overall antioxidant action of honey, hence take positive properties on human healthiness [21, 22]. An important disparity () was cropped among all honey types. As with the TPC, the lowest and highest TFC results of the current study ranged from by S. abyssinica honey to by Vernonia honey (Table 3). Comparably, [23, 24] demonstrated that honey samples with higher phenolic substance will similarly yield high flavonoid. The flavonoid from the current finding was greater than honey from Turkey (1.1 to 9.2 milligram QE/100 g) as of A. mellifera [25] and marketable honey from Portugal ( milligram QE/100 g in citrus) from A. mellifera [26].

3.2.3. Antioxidant Content (AC)

AC of the current study is defined as milligrams of ascorbic acid equal in hundred grams of the sample. As those of TPC and TFC, Vernonia honey demonstrated the highest AC () followed by C. macrostachyus (). However, statistically similar () and less AC was obtained by Guizotia(), C. arabica (), Eucalyptus spp. (), and S. abyssinica honey () (Table 3). The surprisingly highest result was obtained from Vernonia honey in TPC, TFC, and AC.

The AC of the current result was comparable to those from Malaysian honey that recorded an average of 14.23 to 26.64 mg AEAC/100 g [27], Pakistani natural honey (8.30–22.10 mg AEAC/100 g [28]), multifloral Burkina Fasan honey (10.20–37.87 mg AEAC/100 g [29]), and Czech honey from 14.15 to 40.71 mg AEAC/100 g [30] while less than Manuka honey (84.47 mg/100 g) [27].

Comparably, Adgaba et al. [20] have recorded higher antioxidant capacities by V. amygdalina and C. macrostachyus while multifloral and Guizotia scabra honey produced relatively lower. The disparities in phytochemicals of the particular honey floras and environmental origin could bring variation in antioxidant properties. Similarly, differences in antioxidant activities of different honeys based on floral and environmental origin and seasonal factors are well testified [31, 32].

3.2.4. Correlation between TPC, TFC, and AC

The correlation matrix is depicted in Table 4. A strong and significant positive correlation was observed among TPC and TFC (, ) and TPC and AC (, ). Besides, TFC and AC showed a moderate and important positive association (, ). From the current result, the antioxidant properties of any honey type are determined by its phenolic, flavonoid, and antioxidant contents. As the phenolic content of a given honey type increases, then its flavonoid content is also increased and their aggregation could exhibit high antioxidant compounds of honey. The beneficial effect of honey on the health of humans is determined by its phenolic and flavonoid contents. The total phenolic substance in honey is sensitive to polyphenol entities, ascorbic acid, and vitamin E [33].

Comparable correlation with the current study was obtained between TPC and TFC () and TFC and AC (0.730) [24]. In contradiction with this finding, there is no correlation between TPC and AC (0.165) from Algeria [24] and Czech [30]. A. mellifera honey was observed. However, a highly positive correlation between AEAC and TPC () from Malaysian raw honey [27] and a positive association between flavonoid, phenolic, and antioxidant activities in Brazilian honey [34] were exhibited which are similar with this result.

4. Conclusion

This study showed that the country has a potential for cropping different brands of honey owing to the availability of dominant honey plant diversity in a different environments. No study was carried out on the harvesting period and antioxidant properties of honey based on floral origin. Unifloral honey types, namely, Guizotia, C. arabica, Vernonia, C. macrostachyus, S. abyssinica, and Eucalyptus, could be cropped in November, February, February, May, April, and June, respectively, where they abundantly occurred and are major honey plants in Ethiopia. Based on the current result, all the tested honey types exhibited good antioxidant properties with the highest TPC, TFC, and AC by Vernonia followed by C. macrostachyus while S. abyssinica was the least followed by Eucalyptus honey. Moreover, TPC, TFC, and AC had a strong positive correlation and are important parameters for the antioxidant constituents of the honey sample.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available upon reasonable request from the relevant author.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the Ethiopian Agricultural Research Institute for financial support and Addis Ababa University, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Department of Food Science, for antioxidant analysis. I also thank the Holota Apiculture Research Center and botany laboratory technician for the assistance in the melissopalynological analysis. This research was carried out at Addis Ababa University, Department of Food Science, for antioxidant analysis and Holota Apiculture Research Center for melissopalynological analysis.

References

D. Wu and A. Cederbaum, “Alcohol, oxidative stress, and free radical damage,” Alcohol Research & Health, vol. 27, pp. 277–284, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. S. Lau, X. Y. Tian, Y. Huang, D. Murugan, F. I. Achike, and M. R. Mustafa, “Boldine protects endothelial function in hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress through an antioxidant mechanism,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 367–375, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Koca and F. Karadeniz, “Serbest radikal olusum mekanizmaları ve antioksidan savunma sistemleri,” Gıda Mühendisliği Dergisi, vol. 16, pp. 32–37, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
K. D. Bozdogan and B. Mungan, “Effects of variety, maturation and growing region on chemical properties, fatty acid and sterol compositions of virgin olive oils,” Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, vol. 93, pp. 1499–1508, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. S. Chua, N. L. Rahaman, N. A. Adnan, and T. T. Eddie Tan, “Antioxidant activity of three honey samples in relation with their biochemical components,” Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 313798, 8 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Elbanna, K. Attalla, M. Elbadry, A. Abdeltawab, H. Gamal-Eldin, and M. F. Ramadan, “Impact of floral sources and processing on the antimicrobial activities of different unifloral honeys,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 194–200, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Louveaux, A. Maurizio, and G. Vorwohl, “Methods of melissopalynology,” Bee World, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 139–157, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Adgaba, Atlas of Pollen Grains of Major Honey Bee Flora of Ethiopia, vol. 152, Holeta Bee Research Centre, Commercial Printing Enterprise, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2007.
N. Kebede, P. Subramanian, and M. Gebrekidan, Physicochemical Analysis of Tigray Honey: An Attempt to Determine Major Quality Markers of Honey, Chemical Society of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2011.
A. Islam, I. Khalil, N. Islam et al., “Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of Bangladeshi honeys stored for more than one year,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 177, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. K. Karabagias, A. Badeka, S. Kontakos, S. Karabournioti, and M. G. Kontominas, “Characterisation and classification of Greek pine honeys according to their geographical origin based on volatiles, physicochemical parameters and chemometrics,” Food Chemistry, vol. 146, pp. 548–557, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Tura and A. Admassu, “Pollen analysis of honey from Borana zone of Southern Ethiopia,” Journal of Apicultural Science, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 233–242, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Tura and A. Admassu, “Honeybee flora resources of Guji zone, Ethiopia,” Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, vol. 8, no. 21, pp. 1–9, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
M. L. Al, D. Daniel, A. Moise, O. Bobis, L. Laslo, and S. Bogdanov, “Physico-chemical and bioactive properties of different floral origin honeys from Romania,” Food Chemistry, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 863–867, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Hailu and A. Belay, “Melissopalynology and antioxidant properties used to differentiate Schefflera abyssinica and polyfloral honey,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 10, article e0240868, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. M. Idris, A. A. Mariod, and S. I. Hamad, “Physicochemical properties, phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of Sudanese honey,” International Journal of Food Properties, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 450–458, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Gheldof, X. H. Wang, and N. J. Engeseth, “Identification & quantification of antioxidant components of honeys from various floral sources,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 21, pp. 5870–5877, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bertoncelj, U. Doberšek, M. Jamnik, and T. Golob, “Evaluation of the phenolic content, antioxidant activity and colour of Slovenian honey,” Food Chemistry, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 822–828, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. de Almeida, M. B. Oliveira, J. G. da Costa, I. B. Valentim, and M. O. Goulart, “Antioxidant capacity, physicochemical and floral characterization of honeys from the northeast of Brazil,” Revista Virtual de Quimica, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–77, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Adgaba, A. Al-Ghamdi, D. Sharma et al., “Physico-chemical, antioxidant and anti-microbial properties of some Ethiopian mono-floral honeys,” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2366–2372, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Alvarez-Suarez, F. Giampieri, A. M. González-Paramás et al., “Phenolics from monofloral honeys protect human erythrocyte membranes against oxidative damage,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1508–1516, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Sghaier, I. Skandrani, N. Nasr, M. G. Franca, L. Chekir-Ghedira, and K. Ghedira, “Flavonoids and sesquiterpenes from Tecurium ramosissimum promote antiproliferation of human cancer cells and enhance antioxidant activity: a structure-activity relationship study,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 336–348, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Moniruzzaman, M. I. Khalil, S. A. Sulaiman, and S. H. Gan, “Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of Malaysian honeys produced by Apis cerana, Apis dorsata and Apis mellifera,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Khalil, M. Moniruzzaman, L. Boukraâ et al., “Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of Algerian honey,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 11199–11215, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Ş. Kivrak, I. Kivrak, and E. Karababa, “Characterization of Turkish honeys regarding of physicochemical properties, and their adulteration analysis,” Food Science and Technology, vol. 37, pp. 80–89, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Aazza, B. Lyoussi, D. Antunes, and M. G. Miguel, “Physicochemical characterization and antioxidant activity of commercial Portuguese honeys,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. C1159–C1165, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. P. Kek, N. L. Chin, Y. A. Yusof, S. W. Tan, and L. S. Chua, “Classification of entomological origin of honey based on its physicochemical and antioxidant properties,” International Journal of Food Properties, vol. 20, Supplement 3, pp. S2723–S2738, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Noor, R. A. Sarfraz, S. Ali, and M. Shahid, “Antitumour and antioxidant potential of some selected Pakistani honeys,” Food Chemistry, vol. 143, pp. 362–366, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Meda, C. E. Lamien, M. Romito, J. Millogo, and O. G. Nacoulma, “Determination of the total phenolic, flavonoid and proline contents in Burkina Fasan honey, as well as their radical scavenging activity,” Food Chemistry, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 571–577, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lachman, A. Hejtmankova, J. Sýkora, J. Karban, M. Orsak, and B. Rygerova, “Contents of major phenolic and flavonoid antioxidants in selected Czech honey,” Czech Journal of Food Sciences, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 412–426, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Estevinho, A. P. Prereira, L. Moreira, L. G. Dias, and E. Pereira, “Antioxidant and antimicrobial effects of phenolic compounds extracts of Northeast Portugal honey,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 3774–3779, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Jantakee and Y. Tragoolpua, “Activities of different types of Thai honey on pathogenic bacteria causing skin diseases, tyrosinase enzyme and generating free radicals,” Biological Research, vol. 48, no. 1, p. 4, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ahmed, B. Khiati, A. Meslem, S. Aissat, and N. Djebli, “Evaluation of physicochemical and antioxidant properties of raw honey from Algeria,” Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology, vol. S4, no. 1, p. 6, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. B. Salgueiro, A. F. Lira, V. M. Rumjanek, and R. N. Castro, “Phenolic composition and antioxidant properties of Brazilian honeys,” Quimica Nova, vol. 37, pp. 821–826, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Ofijan Tesfaye. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

562

Downloads

322

Citations