Research Article
A Mid-Density Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Panel for Molecular Applications in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)
Table 2
Pairwise genetic distance and differentiation between four genetic populations of cowpea included in the study.
| Comparison | Ec.Dista | b | c | d | e | |
| Biparental RILs vs. accessions | 20.95 | 0.24 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.36 | Biparental RILs vs. breeding lines | 19.36 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.58 | Biparental RILs vs. multiparental RILs | 22.26 | 0.27 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.38 | Breeding lines vs. accessions | 13.56 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 1.67 | Breeding lines vs. multiparental RILs | 8.38 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 3.92 | Multiparental RILs vs. accessions | 16.89 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.89 | Number of populations | 4.00 | | | | | | Average no. of genotypes per population | 82.50 | | | | | | Number of loci | 2753 | | | | | | Minimum | 8.38 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.36 | Maximum | 22.26 | 0.27 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 3.92 | Average | 16.90 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 1.30 |
|
|
aEuclidean genetic distance. bNei’s differentiation measure. cLower bound confidence interval. dUpper bound confidence interval. eWright’s differentiation measure. is the gene flow between populations, calculated as . |