Research Article

Prevalence, Treatment, and Associated Factors of Hypertension in Spain: A Comparative Study between Populations

Table 1

(a) Clinical characteristics of the study population according to sex and living area.

MenWomen

UrbanRuralpTotalUrbanRuralPTotal

N (%)952 (54.68)789 (45.32)1,741 (45.62)1,265 (60.96)810 (39.04)2,075 (54.38)

Age (years), mean ± SD49.96 ± 9.5151.27 ± 10.500.00650.55 ± 9.9949.97 ± 9.3351.92 ± 10.54< 0.00150.73 ± 9.87

Age ranges (years)

 31-45 n (%)371 (38.97)288 (36.50)0.001659 (37.85)470 (37.15)279 (34.44)< 0.001749 (36.10)
 46-60 n (%)420 (44.12)309 (39.16)729 (41.87)604 (47.75)329 (40.62)933 (44.96)
 61-77 n (%)161 (16.91)192 (24.33)353 (20.28)191 (15.10)202 (24.94)393 (18.94)

BMI (kg/m2),27.65 ± 3.5827.45 ± 3.620.23027.56 ± 3.6028.04 ± 4.8627.96 ± 4.990.72028.01 ± 4.91
mean ± SD

Waist circumference (cm), mean ± SD95.45 ± 10.1293.99 ± 9.790.00394.79 ± 10.0085.85 ± 11.5085.87 ± 10.830.96585.86 ± 10.83

SBP (mm Hg),127.89 ± 18.61126.39 ± 8.330.093127.21 ± 18.50127.97 ± 21.63126.05 ± 20.170.043127.22 ± 21.09
mean ± SD

DBP (mm Hg), mean ± SD80.61 ± 11.2078.82 ± 10.88< 0.00179.81 ± 11.0979.24 ± 11.6478.15 ± 11.120.03578.82 ± 11.45

Microalbuminuria (mg/l), median (p25-p75).5.9 (3.9 – 9.0)5.3 (3.5 – 10.2)0.1465.55 (3.5 – 9.6)4.0 (2.5 – 7.3)4.2 (2.5 – 7.9)0.8044.2 (2.5 – 7.7)

Obesity (%)23.6322.590.60923.1630.7032.130.49431.26
(BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2)

Diabetes Mellitus (%) (unknown + known)8.938.080.5468.54
6.727.480.5267.02

Diabetes Mellitus (%) (known)5.084.930.7445.023.015.070.0243.82
Diabetes Mellitus (%) (unknown)3.843.153.533.702.403.19

Prediabetes (%)24.4130.000.04126.9320.5922.430.46521.31
(IFG + IGT)

Coronary disease (%)3.36 2.530.3112.981.19 1.110.8681.16

Cerebrovascular disease (%)1.47 1.520.9341.490.71 0.860.7040.77

Peripheral artery disease (%)0.100.380.2320.23------------ ()

Known hypertension (%)21.8821.920.98621.9028.7330.010.54029.23

Known dyslipidemia (%)61.9752.28< 0.00157.5760.0052.570.00157.08

() No cases were reported. IFG: Impaired Fasting Glucose. IGT: Impaired Glucose Tolerance. Statistically significant values (p< 0.05) are highlighted in bold letters.
(b) Habits, education, and socioeconomic status of the study population according to sex and living area.

MenWomen

UrbanRuralpTotalUrbanRuralpTotal

Alcohol intake (%)

 Never19.9617.740.00118.9556.1653.880.03055.27
 Occasionally25.0018.2521.9429.1526.5128.12
 Moderate30.3633.5931.8213.2717.5114.93
 Heavy drinker24.6830.4227.281.422.101.69

Smoking habit (%)

 Smoker43.6239.77< 0.00141.8720.3211.79< 0.00116.97
 Non smoker19.0728.1623.2167.7979.1672.26
 Formersmoker37.3032.0734.9211.899.0610.78

Education level (%)

 Illiterate21.2332.74< 0.00125.9331.5527.41< 0.00130.02
 Primary studies3.161.782.59 8.684.697.21
 Secondary studies53.5158.1255.3943.5657.7848.81
 Third degree studies22.117.3616.0816.2110.1213.96

Socioeconomic status (%)

 Student0.11--- () < 0.0010.06--- ()0.13< 0.0010.06
 Retired23.3125.1624.1741.1738.5840.08
 Unemployed10.294.087.4110.654.868.20
 Manual worker36.4643.7439.8428.6936.0931.82
 Other jobs29.8327.0128.5219.4820.3419.84

(): no cases were reported. Statistically significant values (p< 0.05) are highlighted in bold letters.