Research Article

Atenolol’s Inferior Ability to Reduce Central vs Peripheral Blood Pressure Can Be Explained by the Combination of Its Heart Rate-Dependent and Heart Rate-Independent Effects

Table 2

Effect of ß-blockers and ivabradine on hemodynamic parameters at the low heart rate level (AAI 40 bpm).

ParameterAtenololNebivololIvabradine value for baselines value for difference

Heart rate, bpm
 Baseline48.64 ± 4.7948.60 ± 5.2549.58 ± 5.410.45
 End43.66 ± 3.5347.02 ± 5.3246.46 ± 4.95
 Difference from baseline to end ( value; 95% CI)4.98 ± 3.98 (<0.01; 3.34–6.62)1.58 ± 2.59 (<0.01; 0.51–2.65)3.12 ± 4.37 (<0.01; 1.32–4.92)<0.01 (ate similar to ivb, neb similar to ivb)

Peripheral systolic blood pressure, mmHg
 Baseline129.64 ± 15.09126.42 ± 13.86126.46 ± 13.240.11
 End119.74 ± 14.95121.94 ± 12.24123.58 ± 11.42
 Difference from baseline to end ( value; 95% CI)9.90 ± 11.99 (<0.01; 4.95–14.85)4.48 ± 7.91 (<0.01; 1.22–7.74)2.88 ± 8.92 (0.12; −0.80–6.56)0.02 (ate similar to neb, neb similar to ivb)

Central systolic blood pressure, mmHg
 Baseline120.08 ± 14.87117.38 ± 13.11117.66 ± 12.620.17
 End110.92 ± 14.09112.88 ± 12.22114.30 ± 11.80
 Difference from baseline to end ( value; 95% CI)9.16 ± 11.81 (<0.01; 4.28–14.04)4.50 ± 7.62 (<0.01; 1.36–7.64)3.36 ± 8.65 (0.06; −0.21–6.93)0.06

Systolic blood pressure amplification, mmHg
 Baseline9.56 ± 2.709.04 ± 3.348.8 ± 2.940.28
 End8.82 ± 2.769.06 ± 2.729.28 ± 2.36
 Difference from baseline to end ( value; 95% CI)0.74 ± 1.58 (0.03; 0.09–1.40)−0.02 ± 2.40 (0.99; −1.01–0.97)−0.48 ± 1.88 (0.21; −1.26–0.30)0.06

Values are presented as mean ± SD. Ate indicates atenolol; ivb, ivabradine; and neb, nebivolol.