Research Article

Atenolol’s Inferior Ability to Reduce Central vs Peripheral Blood Pressure Can Be Explained by the Combination of Its Heart Rate-Dependent and Heart Rate-Independent Effects

Table 4

Effect of ß-blockers and ivabradine on hemodynamic parameters at the high heart rate level (AAI 90 bpm).

ParameterAtenololNebivololIvabradine value for baselines value for difference

Heart rate (bpm)
 Baseline87.00 ± 4.4886.88 ± 5.5987.04 ± 5.000.97
 End84.96 ± 6.0985.12 ± 7.0585.58 ± 6.38
 Difference from baseline to end ( value; 95% CI)2.04 ± 3.77 (0.01; 0.48–3.60)1.76 ± 3.55 (0.02; 0.29–3.23)1.46 ± 3.82 (0.07; −0.12–3.04)0.83

Peripheral systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
 Baseline136.96 ± 11.60131.52 ± 13.05131.62 ± 14.440.01; neb similar to ivb
 End131.02 ± 11.70129.26 ± 11.66131.38 ± 11.07
 Difference from baseline to end ( value; 95% CI)5.94 ± 10.02 (<0.01; 1.80–10.08)2.26 ± 6.98 (0.12; −0.62–5.14)0.24 ± 9.46 (0.90; −3.67–4.15)0.047; ate similar to neb, neb similar to ivb

Central systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
 Baseline124.84 ± 10.95119.76 ± 11.70120.3 ± 13.300.01; neb similar to ivb
 End119.36 ± 10.91117.62 ± 11.00119.44 ± 11.15
 Difference from baseline to end ( value; 95% CI)5.48 ± 9.97 (0.01; 1.36–9.60)2.14 ± 6.41 (0.11; −0.50–4.78)0.86 ± 8.79 (0.63; −2.77–4.49)0.09

Systolic blood pressure amplification (mmHg)
 Baseline12.12 ± 2.4511.76 ± 2.7711.32 ± 2.930.09
 End11.66 ± 2.1111.64 ± 2.0711.94 ± 3.13
 Difference from baseline to end ( value; 95% CI)0.46 ± 1.78 (0.21; −0.27–1.19)0.12 ± 1.63 (0.72; −0.55–0.79)−0.62 ± 1.65 (0.07; −1.30–0.06)0.09

Values are presented as mean ± SD. Neb indicates nebivolol; ivb, ivabradine; and ate, atenolol.