Research Article

An Efficient USE-Net Deep Learning Model for Cancer Detection

Table 1

Analysis of related works.

Reference nos.MethodsDatasetsMeritsDemerits

[7]CART decision tree for classifying BrCa using BI-RADS scoresDataset from cancer center of Sun Yat-sen UniversityThis model could recognize the benign class tumors in BI-RADS-3 to avoid unnecessary biopsyThis model relies more on the decisions of radiologists and clinicians for BI-RADS scores
[8]A CAD model using machine learning classifiers for BrCa detectionDataset of breast ultrasound imagesThis model identifies and characterizes tumors at an early stageThe model’s performance could have been improved by implementing advanced deep learning models
[9]CAD system based on ensembled deep learning modelsSNUH private dataset and BUSI datasetAn image fusion approach was applied in this model, which helps the deep learning models to provide better resultsNo preprocessing approaches were used
[10]Ensemble deep learning-based clinical decision-support systemBreast ultrasound datasetThe ResNet, DenseNet, and VGG models achieved better resultsThe detection rate could have been improved by using deep learning-based segmentation
[11]A CAD model based on YOLOv3 and Viola–Jones-based algorithmTwo datasets from private hospitalsYOLOv3-based performance was effective and reproducible compared to Viola–Jones’s performanceA limited volume of datasets is used. Unsupervised models could have been used for classification
[12]CAD model based on WNN and GWOBreast ultrasound datasetThis GWO-WNN model had more robustness, smaller training data, and faster convergenceThe classification accuracy could have been improved by using advanced algorithms
[13]Deep transfer learning model for automatic BrCa detection and classificationMIAS datasetThe transfer-learning models combined with CNN increased the performancesThe results are obtained using a limited number of data samples, which could have been increased for proper validation
[14]Grad-CAM-based CNN model for BrCa classificationminiMIAS and CBIS-DDSMThe classification was performed based on with and without pectoral muscles, which helps identify dense regionsThe performance could have been improved by performing the segmentation and feature extraction individually by different algorithms
[15]BrCa image segmentation and classification model using CNNMIAS, DDSM, and CBIS-DDSMModified U-Net segmentation with data augmentation and CNN classification performed wellFeature extraction could have been performed separately for improved performance
[16]Multiscale CNN for BrCa classificationPrivate datasetThe multiscale dimensions of the backbone networks have resulted in more robust feature representations, thus leading to better performancesThe results could have been performed better
[17]Multifractal dimension and feature fusion-based BrCa detection modelBCDR, DDSM, MIAS, and INbreastThis model can be used to identify subtypes of BrCa in mammography imagesThis model has yet to consider some critical information that might be useful in identifying the risk of tumors
[18]CAD system based on transferable texture CNN modelMIAS, DDSM, and INbreastThis deep learning model could be easily trained to achieve high accuracy in various BrCa imagesHowever, three datasets were used, but the performance was evaluated on each dataset separately with limited samples
[19]BrCa classification model using probability-based optimal DL feature fusionBreast ultrasound images dataset (BUSI)The best feature selection eliminated the unnecessary features, and the fusion model minimized the computational time and increased the performanceA limited number of data samples are used
[20]U-Net study with ICA and deep features fusion for breast cancer identificationBUSIThe feature regularization used in this model overcame the overfitting issue and enhanced the performanceThis model has used limited data; hence the conditional generative adversarial network could have been utilized for generating more data