Research Article
An Efficient USE-Net Deep Learning Model for Cancer Detection
Table 5
Performance analysis comparison based on ultrasound classification models.
| Models | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Precision (%) | F1-scores (%) |
| CNN-DenseNet-161 [9] | 90.80 | 89.86 | 91.53% | 89.26 | 89.56% | CNN-VGG-16 [9] | 88.72 | 83.78 | 92.59% | 89.86 | 86.71% | CART [7] | 94.58 | 90.80 | 98.84% | 98.91 | NA | R-boost [20] | 97.06 | 97.48 | NA | 98.16 | 97.82% | M-tree [20] | 96.10 | 97.91 | NA | 96.61 | 97.16% | Proposed model | 97.87 | 98.45 | 95.24% | 98.96 | 98.70% |
|
|