Research Article
Wide E-Plane Beamwidth Microstrip Patch Antenna Using H-Shaped Gap-Coupling with Three Parasitic Patches for the K-Band
Table 1
Advantages and disadvantages of wide-beamwidth antenna techniques.
| | Size (compared with a general patch ant.) | Planar single-substrate structure | Low profile | Easy integration with other components |
| Hybrid zeroth-order resonance | Same | Yes | Yes | No | Parasitic element | Same | No | Yes or no | Yes or no | Larger | Yes | Yes | Yes | Composite dielectric substrate, high-permittivity substrate, or extended dielectric substrate | Same or smaller | No | No | No | Extra reflector or ground plane | Same | No | No | No | Huygens source antenna based on magnetic and electric near-field resonant parasitic | — | No | No | No | Magnetoelectric dipole antenna | — | No | No | No | Planar magnetic dipole antenna | Same or smaller | Yes | Yes | No | Triangular SIW antenna | Smaller | Yes | Yes | No | Coupled-fed printed dipole antenna | — | No | No | No | Pyramidal configuration | Larger | No | No | No | Coupled-mode patch | Larger | No | Yes | Yes | Grid array antenna | — | No | Yes | No |
|
|