Research Article

Design and Analysis of a Low-Profile Dual-Band Circularly Polarized Monopole Antenna Based on Characteristic Mode Analysis

Table 2

Comparison between referenced antenna and proposed antenna.

ReferenceOverlapped lower band (GHz) %Overlapped upper band (GHz) %Overall size (mm3)Gain (dBi)

[3]0.902–0.928, 2.842.40–2.48, 3.28-0.60, 1.2
[5]1.236–1.286, 4.21.532–1.572, 2.63.4, 2.9
[8]2.27–2.52, 10.55.14–5.47, 6.562.4, 2.8
[9]2.39-2.43, 1.665.06-5.70, 11.92.0, 4.5
[10]1.538–1.603, 4.142.28–2.384, 4.594.3
[11]2.2–2.9, 27.453.40–3.65, 7.12.5
[12]2.39–2.57, 7.35.213–6.0, 162.48, 3.09
[13]2.096–2.105, 0.43.59–3.61, 0.68.4, 9.9
[14]1.47–1.61, 91.87–2.09, 114.0
[15]1.17–2.5, 72.53.52–6.26, 564.0, 3.05
[16]2.48–2.56, 4.763.48–3.63, 4.216.52, 7.04
Proposed5.62–5.95, 66.65–8.82, 281.7, 1.9