Comparison Study of Two Different Sun-Tracking Methods in Optical Efficiency of Heliostat Field

<table class="table-group" width="800px"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><img alt="908364.fig.008a" src="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/ijp/volume-2012/908364/figures/908364.fig.008a.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(a) </b>SE method</td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><img alt="908364.fig.008b" src="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/ijp/volume-2012/908364/figures/908364.fig.008b.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(b) </b>AE method</td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<table>The annual optical efficiency of heliostat in the case of latitude 30° N.</table>

International Journal of Photoenergy

fig8

Figure 8

Figure 8: Comparison Study of Two Different Sun-Tracking Methods in Optical Efficiency of Heliostat Field 