Research Article

How Can a Multidisciplinary Approach Improve Prognosis of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas of Extremities?

Table 1

Description of the population.

CharacteristicsTotalGroup 1Group 2 value
N = 116N = 75N = 41

Gender
 Male71 (61.2%)46 (39.6%)25 (21.5%)
 Female45 (38.8)30 (25.8%)15 (13.1%)0.499
Age at first diagnosis
Mean (min-max)53.56 (18–115)54.81 (18–115)51.29 (19–85)
 <206 (5.2%)4 (3.4%)2 (1.7%)
 21–4031 (26.7%)18 (15.5%)13 (11.2%)
 41–6041 (35.5%)28 (24.1%)13 (11.2%)
 61–8030 (25.9%)20 (17.2%)10 (8.6%)
 >808 (6.9%)5 (4.3%)3 (2.8%)0.924
Size of the tumor (cm)
 Average12.2812.311
 Median10109.50.292
Site of the tumor
 Lower limb91 (78.4%)59 (50.8%)32 (27.6%)
 Upper limb25 (21.6%)17 (14.6%)8 (7%)0.483
Depth
 Deep seated111 (95.7%)73 (62.9%)38 (32.7%)
 Superficial5 (4.3%)2 (1.7%)3 (2.7%)0.236
Histological subtype (most frequent)
 Liposarcoma35 (30.1%)26 (22.4%)9 (7.7%)
 Leiomyosarcoma11 (9.5%)8 (6.9%)3 (2.7%)
 Ewing sarcoma10 (8.6%)7 (6%)3 (2.7%)
 Synovial sarcoma17 (14.6%)11 (9.5%)6 (5.2%)
 UPS9 (7.7%)6 (5.2%)3 (2.7%)0.238
Grade (FNCLCC)
 115 (12.9%)8 (6.9%)7 (6%)
 267 (57.7%)46 (39.6%)21 (18%)
 334 (29.4%)22 (19%)12 (10.5%)0.525
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
 Realized56 (48%)42 (36.2%)14 (12.1%)
 Not realized60 (52%)37 (29.3%)26 (22.4%)0.030