Review Article
The Design Blueprint for a Large-Scale Telehealth Platform
Table 1
Blockchain technology comparisons for telehealth platform.
| Measurement | Ethereum | Hyperledger | EOS | Tendermint |
| Blockchain performance | | | | | (1) Number of transactions per second (TPS) | 15-30 | 300 | 500 | 2,002 | (2) Data reading response time of 1,000 records under 10 concurrent sessions | 3.72 min | 1333 ms | 1 ms | 3 ms | (3) Insert of one record response time under 10 concurrent sessions with duplication check | 209 ms | 235 ms | 9662 ms | 3 ms | (4) Update data in one record response time under 10 concurrent sessions | 208 ms | 544 ms | 260 ms | 2 ms | Blockchain mutuality | | | | | (5) Mutuality level (5 years) | Y | Y | N | Y | (6) Live application in health technology | Y | Y | Y | Y | Node management | | | | | (7) Fault tolerant (nodes) | 2 | 3 (orderer) | (ratio 2/3) | (ratio 2/3) | (8) Restructure blockchain (add nodes) | N | Y | N | N | Application fulfillment | | | | | (9) Smart contract language supports | Solidity | Go | C++ | Go, Js | (10) Transaction management | N | Y | N | N | (11) Cryptocurrency account balance for trading | Y | N | Y | Y | (12) Access data from smart contract with ranges | N | Y | Y | N | (13) Creating index on data from smart contract | N | N | Y | Y | Blockchain security | | | | | (14) Authentication and account management | Y | Y | Y | Y | (15) Encryption data in the smart contract | N | Partial | N | N | (16) Access control on smart contract | N | Y | N | N |
|
|