Research Article
Risk Assessment of Lung Cancer Caused by Indoor Radon Exposure in China during 2006–2016: A Multicity, Longitudinal Analysis
Table 1
ERR and PAR of lung cancer incidence in 2006.
| City | (Bq/m3) | | | ERRa (95% CIs) | PARa (%) | Lung cancer incidence (1/105) | Male | Female |
| Beijing | 33.9 | 0.182 | 0.082 | 0.156 (0.013, 0.326) | 13.52 | 5.49 | 3.05 | Shanghai | 18.2 | 0.094 | 0.043 | 0.081 (0.044, 0.206) | 7.48 | 3.22 | 1.46 | Guangzhou | 35.7 | 0.288 | 0.130 | 0.247 (0.122, 0.616) | 19.79 | 17.01 | 7.68 | Shijiazhuang | 26.3 | 0.110 | 0.050 | 0.094 (0.012, 0.201) | 8.59 | NA | NA | Wuhan | 31.1 | 0.145 | 0.065 | 0.124 (0.057, 0.304) | 11.01 | 5.68 | 2.69 | Lianyungang | 17.9 | 0.070 | 0.032 | 0.060 (0.027, 0.147) | 5.65 | 3.59 | 1.48 | Suzhou | 34.0 | 0.300 | 0.135 | 0.257 (0.118, 0.632) | 20.43 | 11.65 | 4.05 | Shenyang | 80.0 | 0.216 | 0.097 | 0.185 (0.055, 0.425) | 15.64 | 9.41 | 5.25 | Qingdao | 40.7 | 0.191 | 0.086 | 0.164 (0.071, 0.398) | 14.06 | NA | NA | Hangzhou | 25.5 | 0.205 | 0.092 | 0.176 (0.060, 0.413) | 14.98 | 7.76 | 2.95 | Jiaxing | 25.7 | 0.083 | 0.037 | 0.071 (0.026, 0.169) | 6.66 | 3.50 | 1.18 | Zhongshan | 63.2 | 0.328 | 0.148 | 0.281 (0.127, 0.690) | 21.95 | 14.08 | 5.72 | Yinchuan | 67.1 | 0.287 | 0.129 | 0.246 (0.107, 0.599) | 19.72 | NA | NA | Xi’ning | 20.9 | 0.110 | 0.050 | 0.094 (0.042, 0.230) | 8.60 | NA | NA | Tianjin | 41.3 | 0.314 | 0.141 | 0.269 (0.122, 0.660) | 21.21 | NA | NA |
|
|
aCalculation was based on the national average smoking prevalence (about 26%).
|