Review Article
Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab in COVID-19: A Systematic Review
Table 1
Quality assessment of the included studies.
| | Criteria | Studies | | Della-Torre et.al. | Montesarchio et.al. | Benucci et.al. | Lescure et.al. | Gremese et.al. |
| | Clarity of the study objectives | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | Whether the study period (start date and end date) was stated clearly or not | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | Whether the description of the patient selection criteria was clear or not | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | | The stated sarilumab treatment method and dose | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | Study was conducted in multicenter or not | No | No | No | Yes | No | | Whether the baseline equivalence groups were clearly considered or not | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | | The definition of the primary outcome (PaO2/FiO2 ratio or overall mortality or ventilation requirement) prior to the study | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | | If the follow-up period was long enough (at least two months) | No | No | No | Yes | No | | Whether a clear hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was stated or not | No | No | No | Yes | No | | The limitations of each study were considered | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | | Overall score | 7 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 7 |
|
|
Mean: 6.6.
|