|
| References | Reviewed topics | Disadvantages |
|
| [1] | Reliability evaluation of electric vehicles considering exponential and Weibull distribution for failure rate | Not considering variable failure rate and failure of composed components |
|
| [2, 3, 5–7, 21, 22, 24, 26, 27] | Reliability evaluation of electric vehicles considering constant failure rate of composed components including the battery, motor, motor controller, two-phase interleaved unidirectional charger, eight switches bridge converter, motor driver, charging unit, energy management unit, lead-acid battery, power electronic devices, and energy storage system. | Not considering the variable failure rate |
|
| [4] | Reliability comparison between electric and conventional vehicles | Not considering variable failure rate and failure of composed components |
|
| [8–12] | Determining variable failure rate of composed components of wind turbine, current type tidal turbines, and barrage type tidal units arisen from variation in the wind speed, tidal current speed, and tidal height | Not considering the reliability of electric vehicles |
|
| [13–20, 23, 25] | Reliability evaluation of distribution network, generation power system, composite power system, DC and AC power system containing electric vehicles | The electric vehicles are modeled as energy storage systems and do not consider the failure of composed components and also variable failure rate. |
|
| [28] | Reliability evaluation of different types of electric vehicles | Not considering the variable failure rate |
|
