A Novel Design, Economic Assessment, and Fuzzy-Based Technical Validation of an Islanded Microgrid: A Case Study on Load Model of Kibber Village in Himachal Pradesh

Table 9

Comparison of the different optimized configurations.

Sr. No.	Classification	Parameter	Configuration
			PV + battery	PV + wind + battery	Wind + battery
1.	Architecture	Architecture/CS6K-290MS (kW)	54	47.25	—
2.		Architecture/G10	0	1	13
3.		Architecture/Dis12 V	183	177	213
4.		Architecture/Converter (kW)	25.729	26.916	24.657
5.		Architecture/Dispatch	CC	CC	CC
6.	Cost	Cost/COE ($)	0.127	0.171	0.277
7.		Cost/NPC ($)	248966.1	282958.1	818979.3
8.		Cost/Operating cost ($/yr)	3749.477	4148.756	10867.12
9.		Cost/Initial capital ($)	20049.6	229325	678494.4
10.		Cost/Fuel cost ($/yr)	0	0	0
11.		Cost/o&M ($/yr)	2952.503	3123.583	6814.287
12.		CS6K-290MS/Capital cost ($)	111857.1	97875	—
13.		G10/Capital cost ($)	—	44500	578500
14.		G10/o&M cost ($)	—	400	5200
15.	System component (s)	System/Ren frac (%)	100	100	100
16.		System/Total fuel (L/yr)	0	0	0
17.		System/Cap short (%)	0.09759784	0.000764332	0.0985902
18.		System/Excess elec (%)	36.56232	39.48045	66.7873
19.		System/Unmet load (%)	0.02102028	2.20E-15	0.05702304
20.		System/Unmet load (kWh/yr)	12.37111	1.29E-12	33.55989
21.		System/CO2 (kg/yr)	0	0	0
22.		CS6K-290MS/Production (kWh/yr)	104196.7	91172.15	—
23.		G10/Production (kWh/yr)	—	15099.26	196290.4
24.		Dis12 V/Autonomy (hr)	67.86707	65.64193	78.99283
25.		Dis12 V/Annual throughput (kWh/yr)	19737.41	13697.71	19485.57
26.		Dis12 V/Nominal capacity (kWh)	569.9479	551.2612	663.3821
27.		Dis12 V/Useable nominal capacity (kWh)	455.9584	441.0089	530.7056