Research Article
Frequency Stability Enhancement of Microgrid Using Optimization Techniques-Based Adaptive Virtual Inertia Control
Table 7
Additional comparison between the existing control techniques from the pool of literature and the proposed control technique.
| Reference | Type of control | Merits | Demerits |
| [36] | Droop control and VSG are proposed | It is easy to implement with low cost | Complexity in tuning parameters | [37] | Derivative control-based virtual inertia | It reduces overshoot response | Complex tuning due to trial-and-error method | [38] | Adaptive dynamics programming | Faster frequency response and reduced overshoot in d-axis | It ignores the q-axis making it incomplete due to reactive component | [39] | PID controller based (GWO) | Frequency control in multi-source single area | It did not include multiple areas and may not be applicable in microgrid | [40] | BFOA-tuned LQR-based VSG | Suppresses frequency fluctuations | Damping oscillations and RoCoF are not considered | Proposed | MPSO-based adaptive virtual inertia control | Faster frequency response with reduced overshoot and settling time and simple parameter tuning | ā |
|
|