Research Article
Conservation Voltage Reduction Strategy for Autonomous Microgrid with Improved Voltage-CurrentDroop-Based Inverter Control Framework
Table 2
Representation of power saving in 5 bus test system.
| Conventional Q-V droop (V/Var) DG1: 1.7e − 3, DG2: 2e − 4, and DG3: 3e − 5 | Power saving (in %) | Conventional V-I droop (Ω) DG1: 0.231, DG2: 0.206, and DG3: 0.497 | Modified V-I droop (Ω) DG1: 0.221, DG2: 0.216, and DG3: 0.464 | Sl. no | Step change in load (s) | Voltage in case of Q-V droop (pu) | Voltage in case of V–I droop (pu) | Apparent power (Q-V droop) | Apparent power (V-I droop) |
| 1 | Base load | 1.0 | 0.9 | 9.22 | 8.140 | 11.71 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.989 | 0.922 | 15.330 | 13.200 | 13.89 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.980 | 0.930 | 21.840 | 18.450 | 15.52 | 4 | 1.5 | 0.973 | 0.941 | 26.250 | 24.870 | 5.25 |
|
|