Research Article
Enhancing Peak Shaving through Nonlinear Incentive-Based Demand Response: A Consumer-Centric Utility Optimization Approach
Table 3
The LSE profit and consumers’ cost in case 1.
| Model | Maximum percentage of demand reduction (%) | Decreasing the consumers’ cost compared to the base case (%) | Consumers’ cost ($) | Increasing the LSE profit compared to the base case (%) | The LSE profit ($) |
| Base case | — | — | 5403.74 | — | 1937.5 | Linear | 7.94 at 6 pm | 1.45 | 5325.53 | 1.01 | 1957.09 | Exp | 7.49 at 6 pm | 1/37 | 5329.71 | 0.97 | 1956.39 | Log | 6.25 at 6 pm | 1/16 | 5341.3 | 0.87 | 1954.28 | Power | 5.98 at 6 pm | 1/11 | 5343.83 | 0.84 | 1953.8 |
|
|