Research Article
Enhancing Peak Shaving through Nonlinear Incentive-Based Demand Response: A Consumer-Centric Utility Optimization Approach
Table 5
The LSE profit and consumers’ cost in case 2.
| Model | Maximum percentage of demand reduction (%) | Decreasing the consumers’ cost compared to the base case (%) | Consumers’ cost (%) | Increasing the LSE profit compared to the base case (%) | The LSE profit ($) |
| Base case | — | — | 5403.74 | — | 1937.5 | Linear | 15 at 3, 4, 5, and 6 pm | 8.023 | 4970.19 | 20.10 | 2327.04 | Exp | 15 at 3, 4, 5, and 6 pm | 8.02 | 4970.33 | 19.45 | 2314.38 | Log | 15 at 4 and 6 pm | 7.77 | 4983.79 | 16.71 | 2261.17 | Power | 15 at 4 and 6 pm | 7.63 | 4991.32 | 15.76 | 2242.82 |
|
|