Research Article
Enhancing Peak Shaving through Nonlinear Incentive-Based Demand Response: A Consumer-Centric Utility Optimization Approach
Table 6
The LSE profit and consumers’ cost in case 3.
| Model | Maximum percentage of demand reduction (%) | Decreasing the consumers’ cost compared to the base case (%) | Consumers’ cost ($) | Increasing the LSE profit compared to the base case (%) | The LSE profit ($) |
| Base case | — | — | 5403.74 | — | 1937.5 | Linear | 30 at 4 and 6 pm | 14.99 | 4593.98 | 26.10 | 2443.14 | Exp | 27.39 at 4 and 6 pm | 13.59 | 4669.18 | 23.03 | 2383.38 | Log | 17.46 at 6 pm | 8.88 | 4928.26 | 16.98 | 2266.57 | Power | 15.58 at 6 pm | 7.88 | 4977.68 | 15.78 | 2243.19 |
|
|