An Effective Method for Sensing Power Safety Distance Based on Monocular Vision Depth Estimation

Table 6

Performance comparison of different power safety distance detection methods.

Methods	Technology	Whether to measure the distance	Average relative error (%)	False alarm rate (%)	Processing speed	Whether to support multiple scenes
Traditional monitoring methods	Manual measurement	Yes	10.325	42.44	Non-real-time	Yes
Common monitoring methods	Video monitoring	No	No	67.89	Real-time	Yes
Literature [7]	LiDAR	Yes	3.8971	8.345	Non-real-time	No
The method proposed in this paper	Supervised depth estimation	Yes	11.067	15.35	Real-time	Yes