Research Article
Testing the Constraint Theory of Addiction: Cannabis Constraints Discriminate Users from Nonusers and Heavy from Light Users
Table 1
Factors emerging from factor analysis (maximum likelihood with oblimin rotation) mapped on to theoretical constraints.
| Empirical factor | % variance | Theoretical constraint(s) |
| Addiction concerns | 19.8 | Recognise immanent dependence | Do not know users | 7.7 | Lack of friends to use with | Lack of availability | 7.0 | Lack of availability | Bad effects | 5.7 | Dislike effects | Disapproval of others | 4.2 | Family and friends opposed to use | Cannabis too expensive | 3.8 | Too expensive | Mainly medicinal use | 3.3 | Health problems | Lack of time/other activities | 2.7 | Limited opportunities for use | Have alternative ways to relax | 2.6 | Lack of stress | Switched to legal highs | 2.3 | New | Ethics and religion | 2.1 | Religious or moral beliefs/jaded regarding consumerism | Concern about legal consequences | 1.9 | Legal risks | Other financial priorities | 1.9 | Other financial priorities | Only use socially | 1.8 | New | Addiction experiences | 1.6 | Recognise immanent dependence/health scare or problems/like the drug too much |
|
|