Abstract
By applying Mountain Pass Theorem in critical point theory, two existence results are obtained for the following asymptotically -linear -Laplacian discrete system . The results obtained generalize some known works.
1. Introduction
Consider the periodic solutions of the following ordinary -Laplacian discrete system where is the forward difference operator defined by , , , is continuously differentiable in for every and -periodic in for all , and satisfies () , and and are -periodic in for all with .
Difference equations provide a natural description of many discrete models in real world. Discrete models exist in various fields of science and technology such as statistics, computer science, electrical circuit analysis, biology, neural network, and optimal control; so it is very important to study the solutions of difference equations. For more details about difference equations, we refer the readers to the books [1–3].
In some recent papers [4–17], the authors investigated the existence of periodic solutions and subharmonic solutions of difference equations by applying critical point theory. These papers imply that the critical point theory is a useful method to the study of periodic solutions for difference equations. Motivated by the above papers and the paper [18], we will generalize the results of [18] to -Laplacian systems (1.1). Here are our main results.
Theorem 1.1. Assume that satisfies () and and satisfy the following conditions:
there exist constants and such that
for all , where for every with ;
, uniformly for ;
there exists a function such that
there exist constants and such that
there exists such that
Then problem (1.1) possesses one nontrivial periodic solution.
Corollary 1.2. Assuming that satisfies () and that and satisfy – and
there exists a function such that
Then problem (1.1) possesses one nontrivial periodic solution.
Remark 1.3. As far as we know, similar results of discrete system (1.1) which satisfies and is asymptotically -linear at infinity cannot be found in the literature. From this point, our results are new.
2. Preliminaries
Let be the Sobolev space defined by with the norm where denote the usual norm in . It is easy to see that is a finite dimensional Banach space and linear homeomorphic to . As usual, let Since is finite dimensional Banach space, there exists a positive constant such that
For any , let We can compute the Fréchet derivative of (2.5) as Hence, is a critical point of on if and only if So, the critical points of are classical solutions of (1.1). We will use the following lemma to prove our main results.
Lemma 2.1 (see [19]). Let be a real Banach space and satisfying the (PS) condition. Suppose and (a)there exist constants such that ;(b)there exists an such that .Then possesses a critical value which can be characterized as , where and is an open ball in of radius centered at 0.
It is well known that a deformation lemma can be proved with the weaker condition (C) replacing the usual (PS) condition. So Lemma 2.1 holds true under condition (C).
3. Proofs of Main Results
Proof of Theorem 1.1. The proof is divided into three steps.
Step 1. The functional satisfies condition (C). Let satisfying as and is bounded. Hence, there exists a positive constant such that
We prove is bounded by contradiction. If is unbounded, without loss of generality, we can assume that as . Let , then we have . Going to a subsequence if necessary, we may assume that weakly in and so strongly in . It follows from (3.1) and (A2) that
From (A1) and (A5), we obtain
Hence, we have
Passing to the limit in the above inequality, by using the fact that is bounded and converges uniformly to on , we obtain
which implies that . Let be the set on which , then the measure of is positive. Moreover, as for . Thus, from (A4), we get
It follows from Fatou’s lemma and (A4) that
which contradicts with (3.2). Therefore, is bounded in . Hence, there exists a subsequence, still denoted by , such that
Since is finite dimensional space, we have in . Therefore, the functional satisfies condition (C).Step 2. From (A3) and (A5), there exist constants and such that
Let
Then . If and , then it follows from (2.4) that for . Set
Then from (A1), (2.4), (3.9), (3.10), and (3.11), we haveStep 3. Set for . Then it follows from (A4) that
Integrating the above inequality from 1 to , we have
From (A2), it is easy to see that
From (3.14), (3.15), and (A6), we have
Choose such that and . Let , then and . It is easy to see that . Hence, by Lemma 2.1, there exists such that
Then the function is a desired nontrivial -periodic solution of (1.1). The proof is complete.
Proof of Corollary 1.2. Let . Then it follows from (A7) that and there exists a positive constant such that For any , let . Then it follows from (3.18) that for all and with which implies that which together with (A3) shows that (A5) holds. Similarly, we have From (A2), it is easy to show that Choose such that and It follows from (3.21), (3.22), and (3.23) that This implies that (A6) holds. By Theorem 1.1, the conclusion of Corollary 1.2 holds true. The proof is complete.
4. An Example
In this section, we give an example to illustrate our results.
Example 4.1. In problem (1.1), let and where . It is easy to check that , (A1)–(A3), and (A5) hold. On the one hand, we have Then, it is easy to check that condition (A4) holds. On the other hand, we have which implies that there exists such that (A6) holds if Hence, from Theorem 1.1, problem (1.1) with and as in (4.1) has one nontrivial -periodic solution if (4.4) holds.
Acknowledgment
This work is partially supported by Scientific Research Foundation of Guilin University of Technology and Scientific Research Foundation of Guangxi Education Office of China (200911MS270).