Comparison Study on the Performances of Finite Volume Method and Finite Difference Method

<table class="table-group" width="800px"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><img alt="596218.fig.0010a" src="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/jam/volume-2013/596218/figures/596218.fig.0010a.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(a) </b>Second-order central difference scheme</td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><img alt="596218.fig.0010b" src="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/jam/volume-2013/596218/figures/596218.fig.0010b.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(b) </b>Second-order upwind scheme</td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<table>Comparison of the robustness of lid-driven flow with variant schemes.</table>

Journal of Applied Mathematics

fig10

Figure 10

Figure 10: Comparison Study on the Performances of Finite Volume Method and Finite Difference Method 