Research Article

Pharmacokinetic Comparisons of Eight Active Components from Raw Farfarae Flos and Honey-Processed Farfarae Flos after Oral Administration in Rats by UHPLC-MS/MS Approaches

Table 1

Optimized SRM parameters of 8 analytes and IS.

Peak no.AnalytesRetention time (min)Precursor ion ([M − H]) (m/z)Product ion (m/z)Collision energy (V)Polarity

1Ferulic acid13.05193.00134.00; 177.9727.93; 13.03Negative
2Caffeic acid6.11178.96107.0; 135.022.66; 15.53Negative
3Chlorogenic acid5.65353.04126.92; 190.9734.30; 16.75Negative
4Neochlorogenic acid2.94353.04178.97; 190.9718.23; 18.87Negative
5Cryptochlorogenic acid6.14353.04173.04; 178.9715.65; 16.26Negative
6Isochlorogenic acid B12.86515.00173.05; 353.0726.91; 18.98Negative
7Isochlorogenic acid C14.40515.10172.97; 353.1628.35; 17.92Negative
8Rutin13.17610.00300.04; 301.0136.35; 34.64Negative
ISChloramphenicol10.85321.00152.07; 257.0716.26; 16.22Negative