Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry / 2020 / Article / Tab 1 / Research Article
Pharmacokinetic Comparisons of Eight Active Components from Raw Farfarae Flos and Honey-Processed Farfarae Flos after Oral Administration in Rats by UHPLC-MS/MS Approaches Table 1 Optimized SRM parameters of 8 analytes and IS.
Peak no. Analytes Retention time (min) Precursor ion ([M − H]− ) (m/z ) Product ion (m/z ) Collision energy (V) Polarity 1 Ferulic acid 13.05 193.00 134.00; 177.97 27.93; 13.03 Negative 2 Caffeic acid 6.11 178.96 107.0; 135.0 22.66; 15.53 Negative 3 Chlorogenic acid 5.65 353.04 126.92; 190.97 34.30; 16.75 Negative 4 Neochlorogenic acid 2.94 353.04 178.97; 190.97 18.23; 18.87 Negative 5 Cryptochlorogenic acid 6.14 353.04 173.04; 178.97 15.65; 16.26 Negative 6 Isochlorogenic acid B 12.86 515.00 173.05; 353.07 26.91; 18.98 Negative 7 Isochlorogenic acid C 14.40 515.10 172.97; 353.16 28.35; 17.92 Negative 8 Rutin 13.17 610.00 300.04; 301.01 36.35; 34.64 Negative IS Chloramphenicol 10.85 321.00 152.07; 257.07 16.26; 16.22 Negative