Research Article
Discrimination of Fresh Tobacco Leaves with Different Maturity Levels by Near-Infrared (NIR) Spectroscopy and Deep Learning
Table 6
The prediction results (%) of convolutional neural networks and other four methods.
| Data sets | Sample sets | KNN | BPNN | SVM | ELM | CNN |
| Upper leaves | Training set | 89.87 | 92.11 ± 0.46 | 96.2 | 96.11 ± 1.82 | 99.91 ± 0.12 | Testing set | 84.02 | 66.39 ± 7.31 | 91.72 | 87.57 ± 2.79 | 96.18 ± 0.26 |
| Middle leaves | Training set | 90.79 | 93.66 ± 0.79 | 93.03 | 94.24 ± 2.1 | 99.55 ± 0.37 | Testing set | 84.92 | 80.18 ± 2.93 | 89.23 | 86.71 ± 1.16 | 95.2 ± 0.44 |
| Lower leaves | Training set | 91.99 | 95.87 ± 0.43 | 94.87 | 95.71 ± 2.28 | 99.6 ± 0.31 | Testing set | 89.77 | 86.81 ± 4.06 | 93.57 | 92.51 ± 2.12 | 97.31 ± 0.75 |
|
|