Research Article

Relating Sensory, Cognitive, and Neural Factors to Older Persons’ Perceptions about Happiness: An Exploratory Study

Table 5

Predictors of response patterns: results of multivariate regression models.

Model variables“Happy” task scoreaProportion of responses belonging to the “social relationship” domainProportion of responses belonging to the “avocation/hobbies” domain
βPβpβp

Age−0.010.93−0.200.050.000.08
Gender0.970.290.100.280.060.12
Education level0.380.370.080.89
 < High school0.18−0.02
 High school0.17−0.04
 College−0.35−0.14
 Graduate0.08−0.01
GDS-SF score−0.130.610.050.630.000.69
Comorbid medical conditions−0.260.27−0.050.650.010.26
BTACT composite scoreN/AN/A−0.170.090.030.23
Animal Naming score0.45<0.001N/AN/AN/AN/A
Hearing status−2.000.06−0.39<0.001−0.010.76
Vision status−0.650.55−0.030.710.090.04

Note. In the model that predicted SWB “happy” task score, Animal Naming score was included to control for intrinsic semantic fluency ability; in the model that predicted the proportion of responses (not total number of responses), we adjusted instead for global cognitive BTACT score. GDS-SF, geriatric depression scale short-form; BTACT, Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone. aTotal number of responses to the 60-second “name things that make people happy” task.