Aged Persons Living with HIV and Nutritional Wellness: Analysis of 2013 South Africa-SAGE Well-Being of Older People Study (WOPS) Wave 2

Table 1

Regression analysis on high nutritional wellness among the aged.

Covariates	Model I	Model II
	OR [95% CI]	OR [95% CI]
HIV status
Not infected	1.00	1.00
Infected	0.74 [0.96, 2.26]	0.71 [0.80, 2.48]
Confounding factors
Individual level factors
Age
50–64	—	1.00
65–74	—	1.22 [0.66, 2.27]
75–84	—	0.81 [0.31, 2.07]
85+	—	0.09 [0.01, 0.73]
Level of education attained
No formal education	—	1.00
Primary	—	0.53 [0.28, 0.99]
Secondary	—	0.71 [0.37, 1.37]
Tertiary	—	0.62 [0.10, 3.75]
Household source of income
No source of income	—	1.00
Self-generated income	—	0.08 [0.01, 0.73]
Wages/salaries	—	0.09 [0.01, 0.73]
Govt grants	—	0.19 [0.03, 1.45]
From rental property/retirement fund	—	0.08 [0.00, 1.37]
Financial situation
Much worse	—	1.00
About the same	—	1.6 [0.45, 2.35]
Better	—	6.15 [2.23, 16.93]
Variance of the random effects (SE)
Individual level	1.69 E−07 [2 E−05]	0.1937 [2.10 E−02]
%∆ in random effect	−3 E + 03	−1 E + 06
Individual level
Deviance	503.4	415.8
%∆ in deviance	0.0	0.2
AIC	510.5	446.4

, , and ; SE, standard error; 95% CI, 95 percent confidence interval; AIC, akaike information criterion.