Research Article

Calibration of Microscopic Traffic Flow Simulation Models considering Subsets of Links and Parameters

Table 3

Calibration results when all parameters were selected simultaneously.

Percentage of links selected for calibrationNRMSIndividual link flowsRelative difference between total actual and simulated countsGEH statistic for individual link flows
<700 veh/hr700 to 2700 veh/hr >2700 veh/hr

For the Reno network
 1000.0751100100N/A1.20<5 for 100%
 900.0966100100N/A4.50<5 for 97%
 800.0845100100N/A3.30<5 for 100%
 700.0862100100N/A4.20<5 for 93%
 600.0919100100N/A4.50<5 for 100%
 500.106888.90100N/A6.90<5 for 93%
 400.1119100100N/A7.30<5 for 88%
 300.12859088.60N/A10.20<5 for 73%
 200.15559057.10N/A13.70<5 for 57%

For the McTrans model
 1000.0305100100N/A0.30<5 for 100%
 900.0463100100N/A0.20<5 for 100%
 800.0317100100N/A0.40<5 for 100%
 700.0697100100N/A0.50<5 for 100%
 600.136689100N/A2.60<5 for 95%
 500.183572100N/A5.00<5 for 85%
 400.198078100N/A9.60<5 for 80%