Research Article
Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Network by Considering the Station Track Layout and Passenger Behavior
Table 3
Pareto solutions of section combinations in a simultaneous two-section disruption
| | Vulnerability indexes of a single section | Vulnerability indexes of a single section | Vulnerability indexes of the section combination | |
| | Section 1 | | | Section 2 | | | | | | | | BBS–YQL | 0.00% | 5.27% | SH–SHD | 0.30% | 0.30% | 1.09% | 20.13% | 0.79% | 14.57% | | GZF–JSBWG | 0.46% | 9.94% | SH–SHD | 0.30% | 0.30% | 1.09% | 20.10% | 0.33% | 9.86% | | GZF–JSBWG | 0.46% | 9.94% | TRT–CSK | 0.68% | 10.99% | 1.09% | 20.37% | −0.06% | −0.57% | | WFJ–DD | 2.13% | 5.36% | JS–SJ | 2.18% | 6.46% | 4.31% | 12.62% | 0.00% | 0.81% | | WFJ–DD | 2.13% | 5.36% | TYG–SYJ | 2.17% | 5.55% | 4.62% | 11.35% | 0.32% | 0.44% | | WFJ–DD | 2.13% | 5.36% | XEQ–SD | 1.45% | 9.66% | 3.58% | 14.97% | −0.01% | −0.05% | | GM–DWL | 0.45% | 9.49% | TRT–CSK | 0.68% | 10.99% | 1.09% | 20.16% | −0.04% | −0.32% | | TRT–CSK | 0.68% | 10.99% | CYM–DDQ | 2.26% | 5.32% | 2.89% | 16.17% | −0.05% | −0.15% | | TRT–CSK | 0.68% | 10.99% | JTL–SLP | 0.00% | 9.93% | 0.67% | 20.66% | −0.02% | −0.26% | | TRT–CSK | 0.68% | 10.99% | JS–SJ | 2.18% | 6.46% | 2.81% | 17.21% | −0.05% | −0.23% | | TRT–CSK | 0.68% | 10.99% | TYG–SYJ | 2.17% | 5.55% | 2.86% | 16.49% | 0.00% | −0.05% | | TRT–CSK | 0.68% | 10.99% | XEQ–SD | 1.45% | 9.66% | 1.97% | 19.99% | −0.17% | −0.67% | | YHG–HPLBJ | 1.95% | 4.27% | JS–SJ | 2.18% | 6.46% | 4.30% | 12.68% | 0.17% | 1.95% | | CYM–DDQ | 2.26% | 5.32% | XEQ–SD | 1.45% | 9.66% | 3.65% | 14.88% | −0.06% | −0.10% | | JS–SJ | 2.18% | 6.46% | XEQ–SD | 1.45% | 9.66% | 3.52% | 15.79% | −0.11% | −0.33% | | TYG–SYJ | 2.17% | 5.55% | XEQ–SD | 1.45% | 9.66% | 3.23% | 15.99% | −0.40% | 0.78% |
|
|
