Research Article
Profit Maximization Model with Fare Structures and Subsidy Constraints for Urban Rail Transit
Table 4
Optimal solutions with different fare parameters.
| Optimal solution | | | | FF | DBF | FF | DBF | FF | DBF |
| Fare (¥) | 9.64 | 1.97 + 0.78 | 4.88 | 1.97 + 0.29 | 3.3 | 1.97 + 0.13 | Headway (minute) | 5.93 | 7.07 | 8.56 | 9.82 | 10.71 | 11.79 | Revenue (¥/h) | 585051.39 | 447631.76 | 283754.21 | 245907.52 | 184112.53 | 173515.54 | Operating cost (¥/h) | 227269.12 | 230116.67 | 214949.64 | 218266.28 | 208770.53 | 211604.70 | Operator profit (¥/h) | 357782.27 | 217515.09 | 68804.57 | 27641.24 | −24658.00 | −38089.16 | Passenger surplus (¥/h) | 316619.46 | 549028.77 | 146131.37 | 225264.98 | 90194.69 | 123887.64 | Social welfare (¥/h) | 674401.73 | 766543.86 | 214935.94 | 252906.22 | 65536.69 | 85798.48 | Subsidy (¥/h) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24658.00 | 38089.16 | Demand (Pas./h) | 60527 | 77814 | 57967 | 70989 | 55621 | 64951 |
|
|