Research Article
Effects of Coverage Area Treatment, Spatial Analysis Unit, and Regression Model on the Results of Station-Level Demand Modeling of Urban Rail Transit
Table 3
Results of the four models.
| | Linear estimate | Negative binomial estimate | Spatial error estimate | | Generalized additive estimate |
| (Intercept) | | | 12.610 | | | | (Intercept) | | | Population | 0.063 | | 0.000 | | 0.058 | | Zero-car | 0.002 | | Employment | 0.682 | | 0.000 | | 0.683 | | One-car | 0.062 | . | Zero-car | 0.006 | | 2.329 | | | | Worker | | | One-car | | | 1.918 | . | | | LowWageH | | | Workers | 0.245 | . | | | | | MedWageH | | | LowWageH | 0.075 | | −1.588 | . | 0.074 | | Bus stop | −0.114 | | MedWageH | | | | | | | Bus route | 0.194 | | Bus stop | −0.196 | | −0.019 | | −0.111 | | Road density | | | Bus route | 0.113 | | 0.064 | | 0.194 | | Transfer | 0.018 | | Road density | | | 0.023 | | | | Terminal | 0.030 | . | Distance to CBD | −0.080 | | −0.003 | | | | Smooth terms: | | | Transfer | 0.036 | | 0.218 | | 0.056 | | | Edf | | Terminal | 0.056 | . | | | 0.037 | | S (population) | 1.24 | | | | | | | | | S (employment) | 8.806 | | | | | | | | | S (distance to CBD) | 1.077 | |
|
|