Research Article
Structure Analysis of Factors Influencing the Preference of Ridesplitting
Table 5
Confirmatory factor analysis results.
| | Latent variable | Code | Loading | SMC | CR | AVE |
| | Perceived usefulness | PU1 | 0.837 | 0.701 | 0.879 | 0.709 | | PU2 | 0.83 | 0.689 | | PU4 | 0.858 | 0.736 |
| | Perceived benefits | PB1 | 0.736 | 0.542 | 0.821 | 0.605 | | PB2 | 0.847 | 0.717 | | PB3 | 0.746 | 0.557 |
| | Attitude towards incentives and management issues | AIM1 | 0.819 | 0.671 | 0.858 | 0.669 | | AIM2 | 0.887 | 0.787 | | AIM4 | 0.742 | 0.551 |
| | Attitudes towards pubic transport | APT2 | 0.78 | 0.608 | 0.859 | 0.67 | | APT3 | 0.816 | 0.666 | | APT4 | 0.857 | 0.734 |
| | Ridesplitting preference | RP2 | 0.813 | 0.661 | 0.869 | 0.689 | | RP3 | 0.847 | 0.717 | | RP5 | 0.829 | 0.687 |
|
|