Evaluation of Public Welfare Level of Urban Rail Transit considering Operation Management
Table 1
Public welfare level evaluation index system of urban rail transit.
Criterion layer
Index layer
Index explanation
Index unit
Indicator attributes
Service level (A1)
Average operating service time (B1)
Length of service hours in a day
h
+
Maximum load factor during peak time (B2)
Sum of the number of people staying in high one-way and high section during peak hours divided by sum of the hourly capacity
％
-
Departure interval (B3)
The time interval between two consecutive transport vehicles passing through a fixed position along the same direction on an operating route
min
-
Average speed (B4)
Line length divided by run time
km/h
+
Network density (B5)
The sum of the lengths of all lines of the urban rail transit network divided by the area covered by the urban rail transit network
km/km2
+
Social benefit (A2)
GDP growth rate (B6)
(Annual regional GDP after operation-annual regional GDP when the project is not constructed)/Annual regional GDP when the project is not constructed × 100%, the annual regional GDP data when the project is not under construction use the data of the year before the subway opened
%
+
Energy-saving and emission reduction benefits (B7)
Energy-saving and emission reduction benefits are the product of energy-saving and emission reduction benefits per passenger volume and passenger turnover [21]. The benefits of energy-saving and emission reduction per passenger volume are regarded as a fixed value, so energy-saving and emission reduction benefits can be represented by network energy-saving and emission reduction benefits.
Ten thousand people
+
The increase in housing prices along urban rail transit lines (B8)
(Annual regional average house price after operation−annual regional average house price when the project is not constructed)/annual regional average house price when the project is not under construction × 100%, the annual regional average housing price data when the project is not under construction is selected from the data of the year before the subway opened
%
+
Replacement of conventional public transport facilities investment benefits (B9)
The investment benefit of replacing conventional public transit facilities is proportional to the benefit of replacing public transit [21] and can be replaced by public transit benefit index
Ten thousand people
+
Policy loss(A3)
Passenger travel cost indicators (B10)
Per capita ticket expenditure/per capita GDP=(average fare2250)/per capita GDP
%
-
Welfare ticket with or without (B11)
If there is a welfare ticket, take 1; if there is no welfare ticket, take 0
