Research Article
The Longitudinal Driving Behavior of a Vehicle Assisted with Lv2 Driving Automation: An Empirical Study
Table 1
Standstill gap (CC0) and time headway (CC1) values for the Wiedemann 99 model.
| | Vehicle capability | CC0 (m) | CC1 (s) | Source |
| | ACC | 3.5 | 1.8 | Goodall and Lan [14] |
| | CACC | 4.0 | 0.3/0.6/1.0 | Zeidler et al. [25] | | dCACC | 6.0 | 1.0 |
| | AV cautious | 1.5 | 1.5 | Sukennik et al. [16] | | AV normal | 1.5 | 0.9 | | All knowing | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| | ACC | 1.5 | 1.2 | Rossen [26] | | CACC | 1.25 | 0.75 | | Lv1 | 1.5 | 0.9 | Atkins [24] | | Lv2/3 cautious | 2.5 | 1.8 | | Lv2/3 normal cautious | 2.0 | 1.2 | | Lv2/3 normal assertive | 1.0 | 0.8 | | Lv2/3 assertive | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| | ACC aggressive | 1.5 | 0.5 | Bierstedt et al. [23] | | ACC intermediate | 1.5 | 0.8 | | ACC conservative | 1.0 | 1.2 |
|
|